2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DS–AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, data may have been corrupted. This is achieved through an implementation of Dempster-Shafer Analytical Hierarchy Process (DS-AHP) [11], whereby each decision alternative (in this case each IP) is mapped onto a belief and plausibility interval. Consider a set of providers as corresponding to the proposition that the providers in that set are preferable to all other providers considered in the evaluation but not to each other.…”
Section: Infrastructure Provider Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, data may have been corrupted. This is achieved through an implementation of Dempster-Shafer Analytical Hierarchy Process (DS-AHP) [11], whereby each decision alternative (in this case each IP) is mapped onto a belief and plausibility interval. Consider a set of providers as corresponding to the proposition that the providers in that set are preferable to all other providers considered in the evaluation but not to each other.…”
Section: Infrastructure Provider Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the bpas in the form m i (s) where s is a set of one or more providers. Criteria bpas are combined using Dempster's rule of combination [11]. A set of intervals [Belief, Plausibility] for each single IP are then used to compute the order of preference for the IPs.…”
Section: Infrastructure Provider Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been revealed in the existing literature that classical MADM methods cannot efficiently handle a decision problem with imprecise data that decision criteria could contain as demonstrated in [18]. For that reason, the use of fuzzy logic is not only to deal with imprecise information, but to simultaneously combine and evaluate multiple criteria [19].…”
Section: Qos Based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rule of combination (equation 10) has also been used for data fusion in different applications (see e.g., Rottensteiner et al 2005;Basir et al 2005;Fan et al 2006). The Theory has also been applied to model multi-criteria decision making (see e.g., Beynon et al 2000;Hua et al 2008). …”
Section: Dempster-shafer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%