2016
DOI: 10.1515/jso-2015-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Aspect Theory of Shared Intention

Abstract: In this article I propose an original view of the nature of shared intention. In contrast to psychological views (Bratman, Searle, Tuomela) and normative views (Gilbert), I argue that both functional roles played by attitudes of individual participants and interpersonal obligations are factors of central and independent significance for explaining what shared intention is. It is widely agreed that shared intention (I) normally motivates participants to act, and (II) normally creates obligations between them. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Many authors distinguish between ambiguous terms with more than one unrelated meaning and polysemy, which involves several associated or related meanings (cf., Löhr, 2021 for an overview). 6 Authors who have recently discussed such commitments and entitlements are Clark, 2006;Gilbert, 2013;Bratman, 2013;Tuomela, 2013, Roth, 2017Geurts, 2019;Alonso, 2016;Rachar, 2021. I build on these authors here but diverge from them substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5 Many authors distinguish between ambiguous terms with more than one unrelated meaning and polysemy, which involves several associated or related meanings (cf., Löhr, 2021 for an overview). 6 Authors who have recently discussed such commitments and entitlements are Clark, 2006;Gilbert, 2013;Bratman, 2013;Tuomela, 2013, Roth, 2017Geurts, 2019;Alonso, 2016;Rachar, 2021. I build on these authors here but diverge from them substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4).18 This may be part of what normativists and constructivists disagree about. Compare(Alonso, 2016).19 See(Bratman, 1987), which I follow in this section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5-6;Tuomela, 2009). For attempts to model shared agency in broadly game-theoretic terms, see, e.g., 5 A sample of influential versions of intention constructivism would be:(Alonso, 2016;Bratman, 2014;Kutz, 2000;McMahon, 2005;Miller, 2004;Searle, 1990;Tuomela, 2005;Velleman, 2000).6 As at, e.g.,(Bratman, 2014, p. 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And I have myself pursued a similar strategy in developing an alternative view of the nature of shared intention (Alonso 2009(Alonso , 2016b. I also think that the general structure of Bratman's response to Velleman's incoherence challenge is along the right lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%