2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3691027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Characterisation of Regulatory Arbitrage for Coherent Risk Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We finally note that we are not the only authors to have identified that positive-homogeneity as a problematic property for a risk-measure. Herdegen and Khan (2020) have independently reached a similar conclusion by studying a concept which they term regulatory arbitrage, which is closely related to ρarbitrage. They define regulatory arbitrage as occuring when the problem of maximising expected return subject to ρ constraints becomes ill-posed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We finally note that we are not the only authors to have identified that positive-homogeneity as a problematic property for a risk-measure. Herdegen and Khan (2020) have independently reached a similar conclusion by studying a concept which they term regulatory arbitrage, which is closely related to ρarbitrage. They define regulatory arbitrage as occuring when the problem of maximising expected return subject to ρ constraints becomes ill-posed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The possibility of such ill-posed problems was first noticed by Alexander and Baptista (2002) in the case of VaR. See Herdegen and Khan (2020) for a review of the subsequent literature. While the existing literature focuses on the problem of maximising an expected return, and hence on the behaviour of risk-neutral agents, we consider the further dangers posed by agents which are tail-riskseeking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%