2005
DOI: 10.1080/10573560590949359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results of translation test, one may suggest that direct instruction can yield better results than incidental learning in relation to the production of synonyms by Saudi EFL learners (Sadoski, 2005;Lyster, 2007). This proposalis in disagreement with that of Krashen (2004), who posits that vocabulary should be acquired indirectly or incidentally through extensive reading.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the results of translation test, one may suggest that direct instruction can yield better results than incidental learning in relation to the production of synonyms by Saudi EFL learners (Sadoski, 2005;Lyster, 2007). This proposalis in disagreement with that of Krashen (2004), who posits that vocabulary should be acquired indirectly or incidentally through extensive reading.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…As far as synonyms are concerned, Liu & Zhong (2014) explain that L2 learners encountered problems with synonyms due to, in part, L1 interference, given that synonyms especially those that involve collocations differ cross-linguistically. Sadoski (2005) explains that there are two primary sources of effective vocabulary acquisition, namely, direct vocabulary instruction and incidental learning from context. The former refers to systematic explanation and demonstration of ways used to determine the meanings of words unknown to the learners, while the latter refers to the learning that happens incidentally without an intention to learn (Lyster, 2007, p. 27).…”
Section: Vocabulary Acquisition Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that spellings helped readers with the harder part of vocabulary learning, remembering pronunciations of words. Why meanings were especially easy to remember in this study may be explained by several factors known to facilitate vocabulary learning (Sadoski, 2005). The words were all concrete nouns.…”
Section: Experiments With Fifth Gradersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As words are learned, they become embedded in a network of semantic connections to other words (Landauer & Dumais, 1997). Not only verbal definitions and interconnections but also visual images contribute to the representations of words in memory (Sadoski, 2005). The correlation between students' vocabulary knowledge and their reading comprehension is extremely high and positive (rs ranging from .63 to .73), almost as high as the correlation between different measures of reading comprehension (rs ranging from .64 to .79; Cutting & Scarborough, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark and Paivio, (1991) emphasize that concreteness, imagery, verbal associative processes play vital roles in the representation and comprehension of knowledge, learning and memory of school material. Sadoski (2005) summarized in his review article that Dual Coding Theory accounts for some of the most effective vocabulary learning strategies that have been devised for both sight word learning and the learning of meaningful vocabulary. Boers et al (2009) stated that according to Dual Coding Theory, association of verbal information with mental image is advantageous as it provides an additional pathway for recollecting the verbal information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%