2020
DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Delineation Approach to Untangle Interferences in Well Doublets Systems

Abstract: Traditional numerical methods for the delineation of wellhead protection areas span deterministic and probabilistic approaches. They provide time‐related capture zones. However, none of the existing approaches identifies the groundwater contribution areas related to each source or sink. In this work, the worthiness of the so‐called double delineation approach was extended. This task was achieved by simple postprocessing of its dual outputs leading to a highly efficient screening tool. In the particular context… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the forward travel time simulations, the performances of AMGCL solvers are compared with those obtained with the BiCGSTAB (Van der Vorst 1992) solver provided by MATLAB with ILU(0) preconditioning and the UMFPACK direct sparse solver based on the unsymmetrical multifrontal algorithm (Davis 2004, 2006). Because application of the dual delineation approach is quite novel in groundwater modeling (Sbai 2018, 2019) selection of the most efficient solver/preconditioner is of great interest to enhance the competitiveness of this method. Unlike in (Sbai 2018) where a multistep time integration approach was proposed to solve the underlying transport equations as a shortcut to recycle existing transient transport models, a true steady‐state one‐step solver was used in this work.…”
Section: Benchmarking Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the forward travel time simulations, the performances of AMGCL solvers are compared with those obtained with the BiCGSTAB (Van der Vorst 1992) solver provided by MATLAB with ILU(0) preconditioning and the UMFPACK direct sparse solver based on the unsymmetrical multifrontal algorithm (Davis 2004, 2006). Because application of the dual delineation approach is quite novel in groundwater modeling (Sbai 2018, 2019) selection of the most efficient solver/preconditioner is of great interest to enhance the competitiveness of this method. Unlike in (Sbai 2018) where a multistep time integration approach was proposed to solve the underlying transport equations as a shortcut to recycle existing transient transport models, a true steady‐state one‐step solver was used in this work.…”
Section: Benchmarking Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these out of the box bindings, the computational geosciences group in the Department of Mathematics and Cybernetics at SINTEF Digital developed a MATLAB© exchange interface to the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (Lie 2019;SINTEF 2020). This interface provided a convenient means to upgrade an existing MATLAB-based groundwater flow and transport modeling toolbox (Sbai 2018(Sbai , 2019. All benchmarks presented in this note were performed within this framework by using simple MATLAB scripts where the groundwater models were simultaneously pre-processed, executed, and post-processed.…”
Section: The Amgcl Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This Euler grid-based method not only delineates capture zones, but also provides a steady-state well capture zone, illustrating each well's contribution area to groundwater over infinite time. It emerges as a robust and effective alternative to particle tracking methods [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%