2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual-level approach to four-component relativistic density-functional theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key results of this work to arrive at an efficient program are intermediate factorization for exchange matrices [Eq. (36)]; simultaneous evaluation of the Gaunt and retardation terms [Eq. (48)]; and realization of a generic program using a simple scheme to evaluate the coefficient of each element [Eqs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key results of this work to arrive at an efficient program are intermediate factorization for exchange matrices [Eq. (36)]; simultaneous evaluation of the Gaunt and retardation terms [Eq. (48)]; and realization of a generic program using a simple scheme to evaluate the coefficient of each element [Eqs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] There have also been many studies on fourcomponent density functional theories (DFT). 9,[33][34][35][36] Their computational costs have nonetheless been considered expensive since orbitals are expanded by 4-spinors, which has prompted the development of approximate two-component relativistic theories (some of them are exact for one-electron systems). In this work, however, we demonstrate by developing an efficient algorithm and a parallel program that the fourcomponent Dirac-Fock theories are routinely applicable to 100 atomic systems with a few heavy elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further promising DB HF approximations were introduced by Gill et al deriving perturbative corrections that estimate the complete basis set HF energy by diagonalizing the Fock potential from a small basis in a large one. , New DB MP2 methods were also proposed by these authors, where the MOs are obtained from the large basis HF calculation, and the DB approximation is invoked at the integral transformation. , An interesting dual-level DFT approach was published by Nakajima and Hirao, where, in the primary SCF calculation, not only a smaller basis set but also a less sophisticated functional was used . This approach was also extended to time-dependent DFT and relativistic DFT, while Gill and co-workers generalized the method by also applying a cruder quadrature grid at the first SCF run . The DB approximation was used in reduced-scaling correlation methods by Kobayashi and Nakai and Friedrich and Dolg, and very recently Røeggen and Gao proposed a scheme closely related to the DB approach for the calculation of the correlation energy of molecules and solids .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 An interesting dual-level DFT approach was published by Nakajima and Hirao, where, in the primary SCF calculation, not only a smaller basis set but also a less sophisticated functional was used. 35 This approach was also extended to time-dependent DFT 36 and relativistic DFT, 37 while Gill and co-workers generalized the method by also applying a cruder quadrature grid at the first SCF run. 38 The DB approximation was used in reduced-scaling correlation methods by Kobayashi and Nakai 39 and Friedrich and Dolg, 40−43 and very recently Røeggen and Gao proposed a scheme closely related to the DB approach for the calculation of the correlation energy of molecules and solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the most accurate procedure for treating relativistic effects in molecular systems is through the solution of the Dirac-Coulomb-Breit (DCB) equation 116,138,168,176,189,190,200 . Although recent developments have made it possible to perform self-consistent field 158,188,216,223 , density functional theory 120,182,201,222 , coupled cluster 185,211 , explicitly correlated 125,171,215 and multireference 114,119,139,141,163,208 calculations on the DCB Hamiltonian, these methods remain problematic due to their high computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%