A dual process model of affective and instrumental implicit attitude, self-monitoring, and sedentary behavior

Phipps, Daniel J.; Rhodes, Ryan E.; Jenkins, Kailas; Hannan, Thomas E.; Browning, Nicholas; Hamilton, Kyra

doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102222

Cited by 24 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also important to note that the TPB may not encompass all the potential determinants and associated processes involved in explaining variance in health behaviors (Hagger et al., 2017; Phipps et al., 2021, 2022). For example, the TPB is often criticized for not outlining all potential conditions that account for the relationship between intentions and behavior, particularly the reported intention–behavior “gap.” The latter has been indicated by research demonstrating that the effect of intention on behavior is often modest in size (Sniehotta et al., 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These differences imply that research applying the TPB to predict dietary choices in adult samples may not be directly translatable It is also important to note that the TPB may not encompass all the potential determinants and associated processes involved in explaining variance in health behaviors (Hagger et al, 2017;Phipps et al, , 2022. For example, the TPB is often criticized for not outlining all potential conditions that account for the relationship between intentions and behavior, particularly the reported intention-behavior "gap."…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predicting sugar intake using an extended theory of planned behavior in a sample of adolescents: The role of habit and self‐control

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionHigh levels of sugar intake are associated with multiple maladaptive health outcomes in adult and younger populations. Identifying the psychological determinants of sugar intake in adolescents, and the processes involved, may help identify potentially modifiable targets and inform intervention development. We tested the predictions of an extended theoretical model based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), which specified social cognition constructs, habit, and self‐control as correlates of sugar intake in an adolescent sample.MethodsAdolescents aged 12 to 14 years (N = 88) recruited via a survey panel company and consenting to participate in the study completed online self‐report measures of constructs from the TPB alongside measures of habit and self‐control. One month later, participants completed a follow‐up measure of free‐sugar intake. Hypothesized effects of our proposed extended model were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling.ResultsWe found statistically significant effects of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on sugar intake intentions. We also found significant effects of habit and self‐control on sugar intake measured at follow‐up, but no effect for intention. Perceived behavioral control moderated the intention–behavior relationship such that intention effects on behavior were larger when perceived behavioral control was high. However, self‐control did not moderate the intention–behavior relationship.ConclusionResults indicate that sugar intake in this sample was a function of habits and self‐control, and the effect of sugar intake intentions was conditional on perceived behavioral control. Results contribute to an evidence base of determinants and associated processes that relate to sugar intake in adolescents and may signal potentially modifiable targets for intervention.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting sugar intake using an extended theory of planned behavior in a sample of adolescents: The role of habit and self‐control

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…TEMPA provided an explanation for why people who have an exercise intention did not convert that intention into action. Phipps, Rhodes, Jenkins, Hannan, Browning, and Hamilton (2022) found that sedentary behavior was a strongly affect-driven behavior. Although our study did not reveal behavioral differences, it did not prevent this from being a promising direction for research.…”

Section: Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

You don't know why you (don't) exercise: The relationship between automatic processes and physical activity (or sedentary behavior): A meta‐analysis

Wang,

Zhang,

Mao

2023

Scandinavian J Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis meta‐analysis aimed to examine the relationship between automatic processes and behavior as well as their moderators.MethodsThere were 126 effect sizes (Fisher's Z) extracted from 55 independent research studies involving 10,432 participants. Meta‐analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis Version 3.3. Univariate meta‐regression models were used to analyze underlying moderators.ResultsMeta‐analysis after correction found that automatic processes could significantly and positively predict behavior, but the effect size was small (Fisher's Z = 0.057, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.043, 0.070]).ConclusionsDifferent components of automatic processes, task reliability, and study design moderated the relationship between automatic processes and behavior. Future research could explore automatic measures at a neurophysiological level or use population‐matched stimuli for specific populations to improve measure validity. In addition, future research should accumulate evidence on how to reduce sedentary behavior.

show abstract

“…Along with affective attitudes, to increase the amount of variance explained in predicting behavior, research has sought to include nonconscious processes within models of social cognition (Hamilton et al, 2018; Hannan et al, 2019; Phipps et al, 2020; Phipps et al, 2022; Triandis, 1977). Dual process models stipulate that behavior has both a reflective pathway, whereby behavior is a conscious choice, as well as a nonconscious pathway, whereby behavior is a result of automatic responses learnt through associative memory and cued by environmental stimuli (Gardner, 2015; Hagger, 2019; Hofmann et al, 2008; Rhodes, 2017, 2021; Strack & Deutsch, 2004; Triandis, 1977).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dual processing approach to sedentary behavior and physical activity in the workplace

Jenkins

Phipps

Rhodes

et al. 2023

Applied Psych Health & Well

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regular physical activity is an important health promoting behavior. Yet, many adults live sedentary lifestyles, especially during their workday. The current study applies an extended theory of planned behavior model, incorporating affective attitudes and instrumental attitudes, along with habit, to predict limiting sedentary behavior and physical activity within an office environment. Theory of planned behavior constructs and habit were assessed with an online survey on a sample of 180 full-time office workers, with self-reported behavior assessed 1 week later (Mage = 25.97, SDage = 10.24; 44 males, 134 females, and 2 nonbinary). Model fit was indicated by BRMSEA (M = 0.057, SD = 0.023), B γ^ (M = 0.984, SD = 0.010) and BCFI (M = 0.959, SD = 0.026), accounting for 46.1% of variance in intention, 21.6% of variance in sedentary behavior, and 17.4% of variance in physical activity behavior. A Bayesian structural equation model revealed direct effects of instrumental attitudes and perceived behavioral control on intention to limit sedentary behavior, direct effects of intention and perceived behavioral control on limiting sedentary behavior, and direct effects of perceived

show abstract

A dual process model of affective and instrumental implicit attitude, self-monitoring, and sedentary behavior

Cited by 24 publications

References 66 publications

Predicting sugar intake using an extended theory of planned behavior in a sample of adolescents: The role of habit and self‐control

Predicting sugar intake using an extended theory of planned behavior in a sample of adolescents: The role of habit and self‐control

You don't know why you (don't) exercise: The relationship between automatic processes and physical activity (or sedentary behavior): A meta‐analysis

Dual processing approach to sedentary behavior and physical activity in the workplace

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About