A Durable PVDF/PFOTES-SiO2 Superhydrophobic Coating on AZ31B Mg Alloy with Enhanced Abrasion Resistance Performance and Anti-Corrosion Properties

Abstract

A simple and practical spray method is employed to prepare a PVDF/PFOTES-SiO2 superhydrophobic composite coating on the AZ31B Mg alloy substrate. The morphology, composition, and water contact angle (CA) were measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and contact angle measuring instrument. Hydrophilic nano-SiO2 is modified by PFOTES to obtain hydrophobicity. The influence of the mass of PFOTES-SiO2 to PVDF on the hydrophobic properties was studied. The wear resistance and stability of the composite coating have been investigated by immersion test, cross-cut adhesion test and friction test. Additionally, the corrosion resistance was measured by electrochemical workstation and salt spray corrosion test. The CA of PVDF/PFOTES-SiO2 coating is 161.3° and the sliding angle (SAs) is less than 2°. After 10× the sandpaper friction test, the superhydrophobic contact angle of the coating remained above 155°, and the sliding angle was less than 5°, which indicated that the prepared coating is a strong superhydrophobic coating with good wear resistance. The results of the electrochemical tests show that the superhydrophobic coating improved the anti-corrosion performance of Mg alloy, and the water contact angle is greater than 150° after 168 h salt spray corrosion test. Due to its excellent superhydrophobicity, wear resistance and anti-corrosion properties, the robust PVDF/PFOTES-SiO2 coating is considered to have great potential for future applications in the automotive and marine industries.

Constructing An All‐Natural Bulk Structural Material from Surface‐Charged Bamboo Cellulose Fibers with Enhanced Mechanical and Thermal Properties

“…Here, nano‐SiO 2 and PVDF were used via spraying to construct a hydrophobic coating on the surface of the MBFP‐10 (Figure 5b). [41] The influence of the concentration of SiO 2 on the contact angle was first discussed. It is not conducive to the formation of a hydrophobic surface when the concentration of SiO 2 is too small or too high (Figure 5a).…”