1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00644839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dust model for the cosmic microwave background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2, Dwek (2004) argued that, combined with the silicate-graphite mixture for the R V = 3.1 model (Zubko et al 2004), metallic needles 9 with a typical length (l) over radius (a) ratio of l/a ≈ 600 and a needle-to-H mass ratio of ∼ 5 × 10 −6 could explain the flat mid-IR extinction derived by Lutz (1999) 8 The carbonaceous grain population was assumed to extend from grains with graphitic properties at radii a > 0.01 µm, down to particles with PAH-like properties at very small sizes (see Li & Draine 2001). 9 The idea of metallic needles was originally brought up by Hoyle et al (1968) and Wickramasinghe et al (1975) to explain the 2.7 K cosmic microwave background (CMB). They argued that the 2.7 K CMB might have arisen from the radiation of "Population III" objects thermalized by long slender conducting cosmic whiskers or "cosmic needles".…”
Section: Modeling the Mid-ir Extinction: Where Do We Stand?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2, Dwek (2004) argued that, combined with the silicate-graphite mixture for the R V = 3.1 model (Zubko et al 2004), metallic needles 9 with a typical length (l) over radius (a) ratio of l/a ≈ 600 and a needle-to-H mass ratio of ∼ 5 × 10 −6 could explain the flat mid-IR extinction derived by Lutz (1999) 8 The carbonaceous grain population was assumed to extend from grains with graphitic properties at radii a > 0.01 µm, down to particles with PAH-like properties at very small sizes (see Li & Draine 2001). 9 The idea of metallic needles was originally brought up by Hoyle et al (1968) and Wickramasinghe et al (1975) to explain the 2.7 K cosmic microwave background (CMB). They argued that the 2.7 K CMB might have arisen from the radiation of "Population III" objects thermalized by long slender conducting cosmic whiskers or "cosmic needles".…”
Section: Modeling the Mid-ir Extinction: Where Do We Stand?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why is because the reaction violates the conservation of baryon numbers. At least two authors (Sakharov 1967;Wilczek 1980) have already argued that a violation of the conservation of elementary baryon numbers is actually needed to explain the observed baryon asymmetry between matter and antimatter in the real universe.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Aguirre (1999) appeals to the possible existence of grey intergalactic dust as the primary cause for this dimming. The grey intergalactic dust might exist in the form of solid carbon-rich needles first proposed by Wickramasinghe et al (1975). This needle type dust might originate from starburst galaxies undergoing expulsion of both gas and dust (cf.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled as emission from normal dust, this radiation implies very high dust masses, possibly inconsistent with the age of the objects and their expected heavyelement evolution (Wickramasinghe et al 1995 ;McMahon et al 1994 ;Eales & Edmunds 1996). The masses required in whiskers would be much lower.…”
Section: Evidence For Whiskersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The caveat to this conclusion, however, is that the long-wavelength (j Z 100 km) opacity of intergalactic dust is almost completely unconstrained ; a population of dust with properties that lead to high opacity at long wavelengths might provide the necessary optical depth. Such grain types include hollow spheres (Layzer & Hively 1973), whiskers (e.g., Wickramasinghe et al 1975 ;Wright 1982 ;Hawkins & Wright 1988 ;Hoyle & Wickramasinghe 1988), and "" Ñu †y ÏÏ or fractal grains (e.g., Wright 1987 ;Stogniento et al 1995). The very accurately thermal spectrum of the CMB does not, therefore, by itself rule out the CBB ; rather, one must compare speciÐc CBB thermalization models with the available data and determine which modelsÈif anyÈare viable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%