“…The exquisite performance regarding the ease and quality of the embedding and extraction of data presented thus far and in (Al-Asmari et al however, not generalised for all the sub therefore there is the need to cull from the 16 sub that make up the best for both the watermark embedding Simple cluster Figure 16 shows the ordering of the sub-bands of the DWT decomposed host image representing the simple normal and complex clusters based on the In this figure, the rightmost letters (LL, HL, HL and DWT decomposed host image, while the remaining two letters specify the bands as explained earlier in 12 indicate the priority accorded band in the watermark embedding nce regarding the ease and quality of the embedding and extraction of data et al, 2012) are, for all the sub-bands and therefore there is the need to cull from the 16 sub-bands best for both the watermark embedding and extraction. Hence, the need to prioriti of the sub-bands based on the best choices of K. In deciding on the orderings in Fig the LL region of the DWT decomposed sub host image because it has been proven to have an adverse effect on the quality of watermarked images and extraction of second level decomposed cover images ones that are on the quality of watermarked images and extraction of hidden data in already marked ima Asmari et al, 2012;Salama et al, 201 The ordering suggested here guarantees high embedding capacity, good visual quality watermarked images and complete recovery of the hidden data, i.e., the watermark. Figure 17 shows the 10 sample images from the Corel 1000A dataset that were used together with the images located at the centre of the simple, normal and and extraction.…”