2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic computational model of motivation based on self-determination theory and CANN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, this has encouraged students to volunteer themselves in every learning and facilitating activity conducted by the teacher. This statement is supported by a study conducted by Chame, Mota, and da Costa Botelho (2019). Overall findings from this study can serve as a benchmark for introducing robotics games in Social Science subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As a result, this has encouraged students to volunteer themselves in every learning and facilitating activity conducted by the teacher. This statement is supported by a study conducted by Chame, Mota, and da Costa Botelho (2019). Overall findings from this study can serve as a benchmark for introducing robotics games in Social Science subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Most education studies of AI have focused on system or application development (Song & Wang, 2020; Zawacki‐Richter et al, 2019). SDT is also used as the basis for development, for example of AI‐assisted decision‐making design (De Vreede et al, 2021), conversational agent design (Yang & Aurisicchio, 2021) and AI algorithm development (Ferreira Chame et al, 2019). Most studies of learner technology acceptance have focused on technical knowledge (ie, computer self‐efficacy or digital literacy; see Alfadda & Mahdi, 2021; Cheng, 2019; Chow et al, 2022; Dorfsman & Horenczyk, 2022; Khlaisang et al, 2021), rather than subject domain knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Better engagement with causal modelling • Incorporating need frustration • Differentiating levels of generality • Identify positive and negative effects of compensation First, while SDT has been formalized to a high degree (such that researchers have even been able to experiment with computational models; Ferreira Chame et al, 2019), much of the research that applies it to games remains disconnected from the causal modelling literature. Researchers often fail to justify why certain covariates have been included (Ballou, 2023), or make causal claims based on mediation models with cross-sectional data without fully acknowledging the underlying assumptions (Rohrer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Opportunities For Improvement In Sdt-informed Games Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%