2008 Winter Simulation Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2008.4736344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic crashing method for project management using simulation-based optimization

Abstract: A dynamic simulation-based crashing method is introduced in this research to evaluate project networks and determine the optimum crashing configuration that minimizes the average project cost due to lateness penalties and crashing costs. This dynamic approach will let the user evaluate the project network to determine a crashing strategy at the beginning of the project and also during the life of the project. By reevaluating the project network possible adjustments to the crashing strategy may be identified an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no specific ways to ignore uncertainties except by reducing, managing and tackling the problems from detailed investigation, such as diagnose and analyse the causes and effects. Frequently, the project will be planned, scheduled and organized using a Critical Path Method (CPM) [14,15] and Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) [16,17]. The project is planned with a simple computer software such as Primawera or Microsoft office package software such as Visio, Project and Excel [18].…”
Section: Multi Project Constrcution Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no specific ways to ignore uncertainties except by reducing, managing and tackling the problems from detailed investigation, such as diagnose and analyse the causes and effects. Frequently, the project will be planned, scheduled and organized using a Critical Path Method (CPM) [14,15] and Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) [16,17]. The project is planned with a simple computer software such as Primawera or Microsoft office package software such as Visio, Project and Excel [18].…”
Section: Multi Project Constrcution Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bashir and Thomson presented a thorough quantitative estimation approach which can offer initial along with updated project estimates from manageability or feasibility study until project completion [33]. A dynamic simulation-based crashing methodology was introduced to assess project networks and determine the optimum crashing configuration that reduces the average project cost to a minimum level because of delayed penalties and crashing costs [34]. Their dynamic method allows us to assess the project network to design a crashing strategy at the very onset of the project execution and also during the time that the project is being performed.…”
Section: Simulation Project Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the required calculations (per iteration of the algorithm) according to the precedence relationship that must be satisfied. stochastic simulation to determine the crash times that minimize the cost of different projects [7], the use simulation to determine optimal resource allocation across several projects in the context of construction industry [8], and pproach to determine optimal resource allocation for the activities of a specific construction project [9,10]. Once again, in all this prior work, only the classical finish to start precedence relationship was assumed.…”
Section: Dss Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%