2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3070658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamic-Data-Driven Method for Improving the Performance of Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring

Abstract: In this article, the problem of receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) is transformed into a modeling problem using dynamic data and an artificial neural network. A new RAIM method based on a probabilistic neural network (P-RAIM) is presented to improve integrity monitoring performance. Compared with existing RAIM methods, P-RAIM has a greater ability to meet the monitoring requirements for localizer performance with vertical guidance down to altitudes of 250 feet (LPV-250) in a single global navigati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In outlier detection, one of the most commonly utilized models is the mean shift model (MS), where the expectation of a random variable is shifted from zero to ξ bias , and another is the variance inflation model (VI). According to the variance inflation theory [20][21][22], a variable with faulty bias, denoted by µ f , can be modeled as a random variable with the same expectation but greater variance than the fault-free one. The MS and VI models are illustrated in figure 1 and formulated as follows:…”
Section: Classification Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In outlier detection, one of the most commonly utilized models is the mean shift model (MS), where the expectation of a random variable is shifted from zero to ξ bias , and another is the variance inflation model (VI). According to the variance inflation theory [20][21][22], a variable with faulty bias, denoted by µ f , can be modeled as a random variable with the same expectation but greater variance than the fault-free one. The MS and VI models are illustrated in figure 1 and formulated as follows:…”
Section: Classification Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the fault-free condition H 0 in accordance with (26), supposed that n s (⩾ 30) samples are collected from the positioning system, i.e. sampled from the position error distribution according to (5), to form a sample set B, the sample standard deviation S of this sample set B then obeys the modified normal distribution [21]:…”
Section: Dynamic Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations