2016
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1164000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamick-Nearest Neighbor Method for WLAN-Based Positioning Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, certain algorithms have been proposed to improve the localisation accuracy of the WKNN. These algorithms are mainly of two types: the first type involves a change in the number of selected nearest fingerprints in the WKNN [26–28], and the other involves a redefinition of the weight for the calibration point [2931]. As the number of nearest fingerprints plays a negligible role in the estimation result of the node position, the improvement effect of the former algorithm on the positioning precision of the WKNN is rather limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, certain algorithms have been proposed to improve the localisation accuracy of the WKNN. These algorithms are mainly of two types: the first type involves a change in the number of selected nearest fingerprints in the WKNN [26–28], and the other involves a redefinition of the weight for the calibration point [2931]. As the number of nearest fingerprints plays a negligible role in the estimation result of the node position, the improvement effect of the former algorithm on the positioning precision of the WKNN is rather limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some algorithms to improve the localisation accuracy of WKNN have been proposed. These algorithms are usually divided into two categories: ones that change the number of NN fingerprints selected by the WKNN [16–18] and ones that redefine the calculation of the weight of the calibration point [1921]. Since the number of NNs has little effect on the resulting estimate of the node position, any improvement in the positioning precision of WKNN observed with the former category of algorithms is rather limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present, some algorithms have been proposed to improve the localisation accuracy of the WKNN. These algorithms mainly are divided into two classes: the one is to change the number of selected NNs in the WKNN [26–28], and the other is to redefine the weight calculation for the calibration point [2931]. Since the number of NNs plays little role on the estimation result of the node position, the improvement effect of the former algorithm on the positioning precision of the WKNN is rather limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%