A dynamic interactive theory of person construal.

Abstract

A dynamic interactive theory of person construal is proposed. It assumes that the perception of other people is accomplished by a dynamical system involving continuous interaction between social categories, stereotypes, high-level cognitive states, and the low-level processing of facial, vocal, and bodily cues. This system permits lower-level sensory perception and higher-order social cognition to dynamically coordinate across multiple interactive levels of processing to give rise to stable person construals. A recurrent connectionist model of this system is described, which accounts for major findings on (a) partial parallel activation and dynamic competition in categorization and stereotyping, (b) top-down influences of high-level cognitive states and stereotype activations on categorization, (c) bottom-up category interactions due to shared perceptual features, and (d) contextual and cross-modal effects on categorization. The system's probabilistic and continuously evolving activation states permit multiple construals to be flexibly active in parallel. These activation states are also able to be tightly yoked to ongoing changes in external perceptual cues and to ongoing changes in high-level cognitive states. The implications of a rapidly adaptive, dynamic, and interactive person construal system are discussed.

Beyond Social Contagion: Associative Diffusion and the Emergence of Cultural Variation

“…Such a balancing would lead to activation of positively related nodes, and suppression of negatively related ones. As a variety of studies demonstrate, constraint satisfaction models provide compelling explanations for a variety of otherwise difficult to reconcile experimental findings on how people form impressions, make stereotypical attributions and are affected by priming (Kunda and Thagard 1996;Schröder and Thagard 2014;Freeman and Ambady 2011). Two implications for cultural diffusion follow.…”

Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process

“…A dynamic interactive approach, on the other hand, predicts a unimodal distribution. This is because it assumes that such sexatypical faces will always trigger the same single process involving dynamic competition between sex categories (Freeman & Ambady, 2011a), but that the competition among possible interpretations this system can make will give way to a normal distribution over the strength of the competition (Freeman, Ambady, Rule, & Johnson, 2008).…”

Rapid social perception is flexible: approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces

“…For example, the Iterative Reprocessing (IR) Model , argues that a sharp distinction between automatic and controlled processes is not accurate (see also Freeman and Ambady, 2011). Instead, the IR Model suggests that goals and contextual features can shape the computations in brain regions involved in ostensibly automatic processes.…”