1999
DOI: 10.1162/108819899569403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamic Life‐Cycle Energy Model of Mobile Phone Take‐back and Recycling

Abstract: ❙ SummaryThis paper reports the results of a life-cycle energy model of a pilot mobile phone "take-back" scheme carried out by the Cellular Phones Take-back Working Group of the European Trade Organisation for the Telecommunication and Professional Electronics Industry (ECTEL) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Sweden during 1997. Using data collected from the scheme, the model calculates a snapshot "energy balance" associated with mobile phone take-back for a variety of phone types and take-back scenarios in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generation of waste Li et al (2015) Generation of Waste: Case Study of China Rahmani et al (2014) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Iran Moberg et al (2014) LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) Babatunde et al (2014) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Nigeria Polák and Drápalová (2012) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Czech Republic Management Boni et al (2015) Mobile Waste Management in Developing Countries in comparison with Industrialized Countries Zink et al (2014) Comparing Repurposing and Refurbishment Sebo and Rosenfelderová (2014) Sustainable Reuse and Recycling Vats and Singh (2014) Mobile Phone Waste Management: Indian Scenario Tanskanen (2013) Mobile Phone Waste Management Paiano et al (2013) Energy and Material Consumption of Mobile Phones in Italy Miah et al (2013) Mobile Phone Waste Management: Case Study of Bangladesh Singh et al (2013) Government Initiatives for Mobile Waste Management in India Sharma et al (2011) Mobile Waste Management Policies in India Williams (2011a, 2011b) Generation of Waste and Recycling: Case Study of UK Rathore et al (2011) Remanufacturing Efficiency In India Silveira and Chang (2010) Mobile phone Recycling Trends in US and Brazil Jang and Kim (2010) Mobile Waste Management Initiatives in Korea Liu and Zhang (2008) Reverse Logistics Network Sahu and Srinivasan (2008) Mobile Waste Management Initiatives in Asia and Pacific Tanskanen and Butler (2007) Mobile Phone Takeback Initiatives: Comparison Franke et al (2006) Remanufacturing Planning Paiano et al (2006) Material Flows at EoL McLaren et al (1999) LCE (Life Cycle Energy) Model for Mobile phone Take Back and Recycling…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generation of waste Li et al (2015) Generation of Waste: Case Study of China Rahmani et al (2014) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Iran Moberg et al (2014) LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) Babatunde et al (2014) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Nigeria Polák and Drápalová (2012) Generation of Waste: Case Study of Czech Republic Management Boni et al (2015) Mobile Waste Management in Developing Countries in comparison with Industrialized Countries Zink et al (2014) Comparing Repurposing and Refurbishment Sebo and Rosenfelderová (2014) Sustainable Reuse and Recycling Vats and Singh (2014) Mobile Phone Waste Management: Indian Scenario Tanskanen (2013) Mobile Phone Waste Management Paiano et al (2013) Energy and Material Consumption of Mobile Phones in Italy Miah et al (2013) Mobile Phone Waste Management: Case Study of Bangladesh Singh et al (2013) Government Initiatives for Mobile Waste Management in India Sharma et al (2011) Mobile Waste Management Policies in India Williams (2011a, 2011b) Generation of Waste and Recycling: Case Study of UK Rathore et al (2011) Remanufacturing Efficiency In India Silveira and Chang (2010) Mobile phone Recycling Trends in US and Brazil Jang and Kim (2010) Mobile Waste Management Initiatives in Korea Liu and Zhang (2008) Reverse Logistics Network Sahu and Srinivasan (2008) Mobile Waste Management Initiatives in Asia and Pacific Tanskanen and Butler (2007) Mobile Phone Takeback Initiatives: Comparison Franke et al (2006) Remanufacturing Planning Paiano et al (2006) Material Flows at EoL McLaren et al (1999) LCE (Life Cycle Energy) Model for Mobile phone Take Back and Recycling…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the concern about mobile phone waste did not make any serious impact until the first half of the past decade. Only one article was found prior to that period, which has given a model take back system for mobile phones (McLaren et al, 1999). Most of the research flourished after 2004, which might be due to the Since, material recovery topic is the most studied one; it is interesting to look into the sub-topics of the same.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other life cycle assessments such as by McLaren et al [26], Hellweg et al [27] or Collinge et al [28] have adopted increasingly dynamic service life models to evaluate the variability of life cycle impacts, and inspiring theories have already been proposed by Fukushima and Hirao [29], as well as by Mahmoud et al [30], a practical method for integrating scenario planning in life cycle assessment, relating to the designers' insights and their needs, has not yet been developed. This paper has the ambition to fill this vacuum.…”
Section: Scenarios In Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent industry-initiated research (the so-called Cellular Phones Take-back Working Group of the European Trade Organization for the Telecommunication and Professional Electronics Industry (ECTEL) trials) led to a series of publications, which contained energy and cost assessments of the cell phone life cycle, in particular, their end-of-use management [8][9][10]. Cell phone manufacturers continued these efforts with similar basic assessments of material composition and energy requirements [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%