Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1067170.1067188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic operating system for sensor nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
248
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
248
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution is possible if the system algorithms are well known and based on the same functional model. There are several research works, which describe a reliable base for future network standards [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Basic System Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This solution is possible if the system algorithms are well known and based on the same functional model. There are several research works, which describe a reliable base for future network standards [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Basic System Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very difficult to use a static administrator entity, because some items often become disconnected and hidden within the environment. Developers and researchers implement many algorithms [2][3] [4] and functions to search and reconnect these "lost" items. There are numerous methods to recognize these events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contiki defines a non-reconfigurable core, in THINK-based OS, everything is a component, thus with an appropriate method, everything is reconfigurable. SOS [17] achieves reconfiguration using loadable modules. The SOS approach for reconfiguration is similar to Contiki.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TinyOS [20], Contiki [9], SOS [17], Mantis [3], FlexCup [25], either do not support dynamic reconfiguration (TinyOS), or provide low-level mechanisms for dynamic reconfiguration -typically dynamic linking of modules or components -that do not alleviate the issues involved in programming safe reconfigurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%