2019
DOI: 10.1177/1729881418825217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic parameter identification method of industrial robots considering joint elasticity

Abstract: Considering the joint elasticity, a novel dynamic parameter identification method is proposed for general industrial robots only with motor encoders. Firstly, the unknown parameters of the elastic joint dynamic model are analyzed and divided into two types. The first type is the motion-independent parameter only including the joint stiffness, which can be identified by the static force/torque-deformation experiments without the dynamic model. The second type is the motiondependent parameter composed of the res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Static tests are widely used to obtain the joint stiffness of industrial robots [17]. In the static tests, a set of forces is applied to the robot end-effector in different robot configurations, while the displacement sensors (laser sensors, vision systems, coordinate measuring machines) measure the static deformation of the end-effector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static tests are widely used to obtain the joint stiffness of industrial robots [17]. In the static tests, a set of forces is applied to the robot end-effector in different robot configurations, while the displacement sensors (laser sensors, vision systems, coordinate measuring machines) measure the static deformation of the end-effector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, non-structural uncertainty is the main factor that causes inaccurate identification parameters. Zhang et al considered the joint stiffness into the dynamic model and improved the accuracy of identification [6]. The noise disturbs joint angles and currents, and the optimization of the excitation trajectory can reduce the impact of measurement noise on identification accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On offline methods, examples can be [18][19][20]. Multiple techniques can be applied through the use of neural networks, as explained in [21] or even experimentally, as the authors of [22,23] present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%