2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
290
0
38

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
6
290
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Two excellent and very recent systematic literature reviews [16,17] facilitated taking stock of the work on resilience in management, the discussion of resilience in sustainability literature instead helped in identifying and challenging some of the underlying assumptions [28,29].…”
Section: Towards a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two excellent and very recent systematic literature reviews [16,17] facilitated taking stock of the work on resilience in management, the discussion of resilience in sustainability literature instead helped in identifying and challenging some of the underlying assumptions [28,29].…”
Section: Towards a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although resilience is a very topical concept that has received increasing attention from scholars over the past two decades in various research domains [15], nevertheless it has been conceptualized theoretically quite heterogeneously, resulting in the proliferation of different definitions, approaches, theories and interpretations [16]. The orientation of researchers has primarily focused on the conceptual meaning of resilience as an "absorptive" or "adaptive" capacity by borrowing definitions commonly used in systemic and evolutionary theory [17]. What is lacking in the body of research, however, is a theoretical discussion of the factors that make organizations more resilient, thus, able to successfully cope with change [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This objective might benefit from using the case study method with family firms in which the succession process is actually being considered by the family members. Furthermore, consideration should be given to conducting a longitudinal study where the evolution of the dynamic capabilities of the potential successor may be studied over time [94].…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As public sector organizations are particularly exposed to such shocks, "resilience" -broadly meant as a strategy adopted to respond to critical and emergency situations -has gained an unprecedented attention in the public policy and management studies in the last decades (Duit, 2016;Sciulli et al, 2015). By borrowing this term from other research elds, scholars of these disciplines are adding signi cant knowledge to studies on resilience, enriching its understanding from both a conceptual and empirical level (Comfort et al, 2010;Conz & Magnani, 2020). As for the former, "resilience" does not represent a typical and exclusive social science notion, whereby efforts have been made to shape it for social sciences purposes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely, the described notion of resilience has assisted social scientists in studying how people and organizations cope with serious external shocks, shedding a light on those organizational features and processes playing a role in responding to external disturbances (Comfort et al, 2010;Linnenluecke & Gri ths, 2010). Hence, it is not surprising that resilience has increasingly inhabited the literature on emergency and disaster management ( Conz & Magnani, 2020;Hu et al, 2014;Noordegraaf & Newman, 2011;Teng-Calleja et al, 2020), including those investigations speci cally concerning the current COVID-19 pandemic as a peculiar instance of external shock (Entress et al, 2020;Jing, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%