1969
DOI: 10.1080/05695556908974716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamic Visual Recognition Test for Paced Inspection Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dimension has, however, provided disappointing results within the normal ranges of vision and hearing. Several studies have reported that observers with the most acute vision or hearing do not necessarily make the best monitors (Tiffin and Rogers 1941, Baker 1960, Baker et al 1962, Nelson and Barany 1969, Megaw 1979. Paradoxically, sensory impairment has been found to be a beneficial factor in vigilance performance.…”
Section: Sensory Acuity and Aptitude Measuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This dimension has, however, provided disappointing results within the normal ranges of vision and hearing. Several studies have reported that observers with the most acute vision or hearing do not necessarily make the best monitors (Tiffin and Rogers 1941, Baker 1960, Baker et al 1962, Nelson and Barany 1969, Megaw 1979. Paradoxically, sensory impairment has been found to be a beneficial factor in vigilance performance.…”
Section: Sensory Acuity and Aptitude Measuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research designed to relate static and dynamic acuity and to develop a OVA test for industry was completed by Nelson (1969). Verification of the theoretical relationship is dependent upon the assumption that out of focus blurring of a static image produces a stimulus identical to the effect of a rapidly moving image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%