“…Single-cell RNAseq is perhaps, in isolation, not especially good at measuring stochastic gene expression—the data are too noisy, and highly top-sliced, capturing accurate estimates of transcript abundance for only the most strongly expressed genes, although simulations indicate scRNAseq can certainly reflect the outputs of noisy transcription [ 16 ]. Rory Maizels [ 17 ] writes a thoughtful piece on how these technologies have been further developed and exploited to superimpose temporal information onto the data. Although data on specific genes in single cells may suffer from technical noise, aggregated information on similar cells is providing the potential to predict how differences (random or otherwise) between cells at one time point can map onto phenotypic differences later on in development (or cancer, infection, etc.).…”