2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-016-3164-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamical Phase Transition of Binary Species BECs Mixtures in a Double Well Potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the adaptation of such optimal control methodologies to low-dimensional truncated Galerkin dynamics is a technique that could find significant potential for further applications. Some possibilities include multi-component and spinor condensates [18] where few-mode approximations have proven useful [11,40,42]. Moreover, extending such control strategies beyond the mean-field framework and into the realm of many-body effects [27,31], is of particular interest in its own right; for a review of the latter, see, e.g., the recent preprint of [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the adaptation of such optimal control methodologies to low-dimensional truncated Galerkin dynamics is a technique that could find significant potential for further applications. Some possibilities include multi-component and spinor condensates [18] where few-mode approximations have proven useful [11,40,42]. Moreover, extending such control strategies beyond the mean-field framework and into the realm of many-body effects [27,31], is of particular interest in its own right; for a review of the latter, see, e.g., the recent preprint of [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some more mathematical examples include the analysis of the double-well bifurcation structure [3,14], the low-dimensional representation of the associated dynamical problem (and its fidelity) [23,26], and the effect of changing the nonlinear exponent on the bifurcation [22,35]. Among the many more physical examples are the interactions of multiple dispersive (e.g., atomic) species [11,40,42], incorporating beyond-mean-field (i.e., manybody) effects [27,31], and the effect of larger spatial dimension (and possibly four wells) [43], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, â † j (â j ) and b † j ( bj ) are the creation (annihilation) operators of the species a and b respectively that residing in the jth well, j = L, R. The parameters t a and t b describe the coupling (tunneling) between two wells, g a(b) and g ab stand for intraspecies and interspecies interaction strength respectively, which is explicitly given by: [38]. Here A αβ is the s-wave scattering length between atoms, m αβ is the reduced mass, where we denote g α = g αα and α, β = a, b.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the dynamics of spin-orbit-coupled condensates [3][4][5], the existence of nonlinear steady state [6], the cross structure of the level [7,8], the nonlinear Landau-Zener tunneling [9], and the the nonlinear Josephson oscillation [10,11]. Most recently, the tunneling probabilities of few bosons [12], the nonequilibrium dynamical ion transfer [13], the asymmetric many-body loss [14], the dynamical phase transition of binary species BECs [15], Interaction blockade [16]and the interaction-modulated tunneling dynamics [17] have also been explored, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%