2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A European evaluation of the patients’ role in clinical education: A six-country cross sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the factor level, both were assessed at good level (Mean 3.8–4.3, SD 0.7–0.7) (Table 1). The detailed results of students' self‐assessed relationship with their patients have been reported elsewhere (Koskinen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At the factor level, both were assessed at good level (Mean 3.8–4.3, SD 0.7–0.7) (Table 1). The detailed results of students' self‐assessed relationship with their patients have been reported elsewhere (Koskinen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data from individual countries is limited and the role of the patient differs between the countries enrolled (Biddle et al, 2021; Rosengren et al, 2021), further country‐specific validation testing of the FSPR Scale with more representative samples and at different stages of students' education is paramount in relation to the language and cultural context and the organization of education and healthcare system in each country. The variation in the cultural context and the organization of education and health care in each country in terms of differences in models and realization of clinical education (Koskinen et al, 2022; Suikkala et al, 2018; Visiers‐Jiménez et al, 2021) and patient participation in health care (Biddle et al, 2021; Dent & Majda Pahor, 2015; Molina‐Mula & Gallo‐Estrada, 2020; Rosengren et al, 2021) might be related to how patients' participation in their care and decision‐making is advanced and how patients are understood and involved in students' clinical education as appreciated partners (McCarron et al, 2019). Moreover, variation in the focus of learning, for example working independently and assuming responsibility for one patient or a few patients, or clinical leadership at unit level in the last clinical placement before graduation, needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results (Scammell et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations