2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A European pharmaceutical company initiative challenging the regulatory requirement for acute toxicity studies in pharmaceutical drug development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, information can be obtained from other studies, which are performed at more relevant doses for humans and are already an integral part of drug development. The conclusions have been discussed and agreed with representatives of regulatory bodies from the US, Japan and Europe (Robinson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Recent and Future Developments For Acute Oral Toxicitysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Instead, information can be obtained from other studies, which are performed at more relevant doses for humans and are already an integral part of drug development. The conclusions have been discussed and agreed with representatives of regulatory bodies from the US, Japan and Europe (Robinson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Recent and Future Developments For Acute Oral Toxicitysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the area of regulatory toxicology, acute toxicity studies are the longest standing class of toxicity test, dating back to the "lethal dose 50 percent" method developed by trevan (1927). However, the use of lethality as an endpoint has long been a subject of controversy on both ethical/animal welfare and scientific grounds (Balls, 1991;Robinson et al, 2008;Seidle et al, 2010). Pharmaceutical companies have stated that "these studies have limited value in terms of pre-clinical and human safety assessment compared to the substantial adverse effects experienced by some of the animals" (Robinson et al, 2008), and this sector itself has recently moved to discontinue the routine requirement for stand-alone acute toxicity studies (ICH, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of lethality as an endpoint has long been a subject of controversy on both ethical/animal welfare and scientific grounds (Balls, 1991;Robinson et al, 2008;Seidle et al, 2010). Pharmaceutical companies have stated that "these studies have limited value in terms of pre-clinical and human safety assessment compared to the substantial adverse effects experienced by some of the animals" (Robinson et al, 2008), and this sector itself has recently moved to discontinue the routine requirement for stand-alone acute toxicity studies (ICH, 2009). Systemic acute toxicity studies nonetheless remain a common feature in a number of regulatory frameworks and voluntary initiatives, such as high production volume (HPV) chemicals programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction models based on sub-acute toxicity data or in vitro cytotoxicity tests have been suggested and developed. According to the respective authors, these models may replace in vivo acute toxicity studies partly or -in the future -in total (Creton et al, 2010;Chapman et al, 2010;Indans et al, 1998;Kinsner-Ovaskainen et al, 2013;Robinson et al, 2008;Seidle et al, 2011;Bulgheroni et al, 2009;Luechtefeld et al, 2016;Graepel et.al. 2016).…”
Section: Predicting Acute Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%