compliance of constituent materials enables soft grippers to safely work with flexible, fragile, and delicate objects. A great number of actuation methods have been investigated, including cable-driven mechanisms, [19] fluid elastomer actuators (FEA), [20,21] dielectric elastomer actuators, [22,23] magnetic actuators, [24-26] and shape memory materials including metal alloys [27,28] and polymers. [29] Among these actuation methods, FEA is one of the oldest and the most widespread technologies employed for soft robotic grippers owing to a number of advantages such as lightweight, high power-to-weight ratio, large stroke and force production, ease of fabrication, robustness, and low-cost materials. [30,31] FEA-based soft grippers have been mostly developed based on claws or human-like structures consisting of multiple inward-bending fingers. This design is suitable for gripping objects spanning a wide range of sizes. However, existing FEA-based grippers are ill-suited for applications that require high conformability or high-load sustainability. The integration of electro-adhesion, [23,32] gecko adhesion, [33,34] or variable stiffness structures (VSSs) can help improve the load capacity. Several studies also address both the issues by designing robotic fingers that can adjust their effective length via the use of segments of VSS. [21] Two main types of VSSs for soft grippers include vacuum-driven jamming of granules [35,36] or layers, [6] and phase-change materials such as thermoplastics, [12,37] shape memory polymers (SMPs), [20,21,38] and low-melting-point alloys (LMPAs). [22,39,40] In another approach, grippers with closed structures have been investigated in an attempt to improve both conformability and load capacity. [23,24,38-40] However, grippers with closed structures are not able to grip objects that are either smaller or larger than the opening orifice of the gripper. Another approach that has also been investigated involves the use of helical winding to enclose objects. This gripping strategy was inspired by natural instances such as elephant trunks, python body constriction, or cephalopod tentacles that use a continuum finger to helically grasp around the objects, thereby increasing the area of contact and stability between the gripper and objects. [41] Continuum, helical grippers that are not constrained by any host have the advantage of being free to wrap around objects and adapt to a wide range of object sizes, shapes, and orientations. There are many instances in nature where continuum, helical manipulators are used to efficiently grasp different objects with various shapes and sizes. Inspired by nature, this paper introduces a continuum, flat, scalable, helical soft-fabric robotic gripper that is thin and lightweight with stiffness tunability and sensory feedback. The gripper is fabricated by a facile method of simple insertion using a computerized technique from apparel engineering and controlled by a miniature hydraulic source to grasp different objects at different scales and weights. It uses a ...