2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A face detection method based on kernel probability map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the proposed face recognition method, taking into account of the above report, we have constructed a face image database on our interest, and its details are given below. Also, we have considered the datasets, such as GT dataset (Mahmoodi and Sayedi 2015 ; Muqeet and Holambe 2019 ), LFW dataset (Mahmoodi and Sayedi 2015 ), Pointing’04 dataset (Dantcheva et al 2018 ), BioID dataset (BioID) for the experiments.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the proposed face recognition method, taking into account of the above report, we have constructed a face image database on our interest, and its details are given below. Also, we have considered the datasets, such as GT dataset (Mahmoodi and Sayedi 2015 ; Muqeet and Holambe 2019 ), LFW dataset (Mahmoodi and Sayedi 2015 ), Pointing’04 dataset (Dantcheva et al 2018 ), BioID dataset (BioID) for the experiments.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F1 score obtained by the ARBBPNN method and the F1 scores available in Mahmoodi and Sayedi ( 2015 ), Muqeet and Holambe ( 2019 ) and Liu et al ( 2019 ) have been taken into account for comparison, which is given in Table 3 . In Mahmoodi and Sayedi ( 2015 ), the F1 score is available only for the GT and LFW datasets; in CRRF (Liu et al 2019 ) method, the F1 score was calculated for LFW dataset; we calculated the F1 score for the DIWT method using the rank-one score and other results available in Muqeet and Holambe ( 2019 ). The results presented in Table 3 show that the proposed method gives better results than the state-of-the-art methods in terms of F1 score.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to corroborate the validity of the system, two image processing algorithms namely a skin detection and a motion detection is designed. For the former, the aim is to group all the pixels into two classes of skin and non-skin pixels for any image [26,27]. This has numerous applications in surveillance, content based coding, and face detection [28,29,30], etc.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They segmented the skin cluster in YC b C r color model into 3 non-overlapping regions; pixels with high probability to be skin, non-skin pixels and pixels with unknown status. They used the first category of pixels to generate initial result and then subsequently used a neighboring procedure for each skin pixel to include more skin pixels and finally a window based procedure is used to determine qualified windows for their further face detection [190,191]. In [142], after obtaining skin probability of the image, hysteresis thresholding is employed to segment skin blobs.…”
Section: Spatial Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%