2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A facile preparation of highly interconnected macroporous PLGA scaffolds by liquid–liquid phase separation II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase separation technique investigated herein has been proven to be very flexible and useful to prepare scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. The polymeric gel obtained can be moulded in any shape and size (52)(53)(54)(55). Microporosity of the final object is dependent on the ratio between THF (good solvent for PCL) and water (bad solvent); instead macroporosity is obtained by adding an insoluble material (porogen) with a defined size to the gel phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phase separation technique investigated herein has been proven to be very flexible and useful to prepare scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. The polymeric gel obtained can be moulded in any shape and size (52)(53)(54)(55). Microporosity of the final object is dependent on the ratio between THF (good solvent for PCL) and water (bad solvent); instead macroporosity is obtained by adding an insoluble material (porogen) with a defined size to the gel phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all techniques allow the production of porous, biodegradable scaffolds, which, however, result do not appear to be suitable for bone regeneration: fiber bonding and gas foaming techniques do not allow for a fine control of porosity, while solvent-casting/particulate leaching is used to produce only thin scaffolds (thickness ~3mm) which lack the mechanical property required for the load-bearing tissue. In contrast, the phase separation technique is characterized by high flexibility and could be appealing for obtaining bone tissue-engineered scaffolds: various parameters can be changed to tailor pore size and porosity and scaffolds with controlled morphology, defined shape and size (52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect of the molecular weight of the polymer seems to be less prominent (Hua et al, 2003). The phase behavior of the system is also be affected by adding various compounds (Hua et al, 2001;Shin et al, 2005). It has been demonstrated that by adding a surface active material such as Pluronic F127, a tri-block polymeric surfactant, the interfacial energy between two phases can be reduced, effectively stabilizing the porous structure of the scaffolds (Nam & Park, 1999).…”
Section: Polymer Scaffolds Prepared Via Tipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that for simplicity reasons, the moduli for the transversely isotropic case (E 3 and C 11 in Eqs. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] are represented by E z and H A , respectively. Figure 5 shows a comparison between the fits obtained based on purely isotopic and transversely isotropic biphasic models.…”
Section: Biphasic Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques is currently being employed for fabrication of porous polymeric scaffolds, including phase separation [10,11], gas foaming [12], porogen leaching [13], fiber bonding [14], emulsion freeze-drying [15], or a combination of these techniques [16][17][18]. While the conventional scaffold fabrication techniques can produce highly porous scaffolds, they have very limited control over scaffold architecture and pore interconnectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%