2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fair contract signing protocol with blockchain support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, even though the protocol of Hinarejos et al[60] is suitable in ensuring fairness in his use-case, his protocol will not help us to ensure fairness in ours. Hence, although, their work is showing all the expected outcomes on the comparison points, it failed to fulfill all of our goals as in their case they are using a public Blockchain which could help a malicious receiver being in an advantageous situation during the exchange.Finally, Ferrer-Gomila et al[49] exchanged the items unencrypted, which violates our goal no. 2.The overall status of their works based on the comparison points is in table 6.1.6…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, even though the protocol of Hinarejos et al[60] is suitable in ensuring fairness in his use-case, his protocol will not help us to ensure fairness in ours. Hence, although, their work is showing all the expected outcomes on the comparison points, it failed to fulfill all of our goals as in their case they are using a public Blockchain which could help a malicious receiver being in an advantageous situation during the exchange.Finally, Ferrer-Gomila et al[49] exchanged the items unencrypted, which violates our goal no. 2.The overall status of their works based on the comparison points is in table 6.1.6…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At the same time, the electronic exchange of information should maintain all the security and privacy criteria (according to Abbas et al [1], Non-repudiation is one). Though a significant amount of work has been done on maintaining non-repudiation i.e., fair exchange policy for electronic exchange in some areas like contract-signing protocols ( [12], [29], [98]), certified e-mail systems ( [60], [65], [118]), and e-payment schemes in electronic commerce ( [18], [49], [79], [90]), the PHR exchanges have not received sufficient attention.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To these classic requirements, we add the requirement presented in [11]: bc-effectiveness. The other requirements are defined in [12]. Here, we present their definitions adapted to the multi-party case.…”
Section: Security Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%