1988
DOI: 10.1097/00003072-198812000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A False Positive I-131 MIBG Due to Dilated Renal Pelvis: A Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diagnostic confidence score was low in these cases (Table 2). Misinterpretation of a normal renal pelvis as a neuroblastoma lesion has been reported [23] and occurred in two of our patients. Bonnin et al [20] described the spectrum of false-positive MIBG findings due to a physiologic uptake in a normal adrenal gland, in the bowel, and in the musculature, as confirmed in three of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, the diagnostic confidence score was low in these cases (Table 2). Misinterpretation of a normal renal pelvis as a neuroblastoma lesion has been reported [23] and occurred in two of our patients. Bonnin et al [20] described the spectrum of false-positive MIBG findings due to a physiologic uptake in a normal adrenal gland, in the bowel, and in the musculature, as confirmed in three of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, 123 I-MIBG findings are characterized by their lack of anatomic details. Based on this limitation, retention of 123 I-MIBG within the renal pelvis may be interpreted as an MIBG-avid tumour, leading to a false positive diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma (1,2,6,18,25,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False positive findings of MIBG scan are suggested to be rare. Previously, there have been less than 20 reports of false positive cases (Shapiro et al, 1985b;Kao et al, 1996;Bahar et al, 1988;Bathmann et al, 1994;Krubsack et al, 1988;Sone et al, 1996;Rainis et al, 2000;Horne et al, 1991;Cortes-Blanco et al, 2000). We report the case of concurrent presentation of adrenocortical adenoma and paraganglioma, which due to MIBG finding was suspected to be intra-adrenal pheochromocytoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although false positive findings of MIBG scan have been considered rare, almost 20 false such cases have been reported, due to various reasons (Shapiro et al, 1985b;Kao et al, 1996;Bahar et al, 1988;Bathmann et al, 1994;Krubsack et al, 1988;Sone et al, 1996;Rainis et al, 2000;Horne et al, 1991;Cortes-Blanco et al, 2000;Jacobs et al, 1990;Hanson et al, 1991;Gallar et al, 1993;Fischer et al, 1984;Letizia et al, 1998;Ünal et al, 1995;Burt et al, 2002). Prolonged retention of isotope due to dilated renal pelvis or hydronephrosis was the reason in 4 cases Kao et al, 1996;Bahar et al, 1988;Bathmann et al, 1994) and abnormalities in the route excretion was also possibly the reason in the case of a renal failure (Gallar et al, 1993), a small ischemic kidney (Horne et al, 1991), a kidney with renal artery stenosis (Cortes-Blanco et al, 2000) and a focal pyelonephritis (Jacobs et al, 1990). Adrenal tumor other than pheochromocytoma (adrenocortical adenoma, adrenocortical carcinoma or adrenal metastasis of choriocarcinoma) was the reason in at least 7 cases Krubsack et al, 1988;Sone et al, 1996;Rainis et al, 2000;Houghton et al, 1990;Horne et al, 1991;Letizia et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%