2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00399.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family support service for homeless children and parents: user and staff perspectives

Abstract: Children and their parents who become homeless constitute a group of families with a complex range of social care and health needs, including mental health difficulties. In response to this, a local authority housing department established a family support team (FST) that provides assessment and detection of a range of problems, support to parents and children, parenting interventions for child behavioural problems, liaison with other agencies, and referral to specialist services when appropriate. The aim of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the families' homelessness are different from those that lead to homelessness in adults. Most families are left homeless by: domestic violence [15][16][17]; repeated episodes of trauma and violence throughout life; child abuse; relationship breakups [15,16]; neighbourhood harassment; mental health problems involving parents and/or children [15,16,18]; special educational needs [15,16]; lack of family and social support networks; lack of access to statutory services [15][16][17]19]; social and emotional problems [17,20]; chronic instability; compromised health [19]; family head with a physical disability, with chronic health problems or with mental health problems [17]; poor financial situations and/or low income streams [21]; precarious housing situations; financial problems due to underemployment or unemployment; past mistakes (e.g., high school or college dropouts); and premature responsibilities, such as assuming a parental role at a young age [19]. The characteristics of these homeless families are heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the families' homelessness are different from those that lead to homelessness in adults. Most families are left homeless by: domestic violence [15][16][17]; repeated episodes of trauma and violence throughout life; child abuse; relationship breakups [15,16]; neighbourhood harassment; mental health problems involving parents and/or children [15,16,18]; special educational needs [15,16]; lack of family and social support networks; lack of access to statutory services [15][16][17]19]; social and emotional problems [17,20]; chronic instability; compromised health [19]; family head with a physical disability, with chronic health problems or with mental health problems [17]; poor financial situations and/or low income streams [21]; precarious housing situations; financial problems due to underemployment or unemployment; past mistakes (e.g., high school or college dropouts); and premature responsibilities, such as assuming a parental role at a young age [19]. The characteristics of these homeless families are heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such scholarship has informed methods of service delivery, helping to generate social support or create positive social networks founded on supportive interventions (Anderson, Stuttaford, & Vostanis, 2006;Bridgman, 2006;Ferguson & Xie, 2008;Hutchison, Searight, & Stretch, 1986;Martin & Nayowith, 1988;Nelson, Aubry, & Lafrance, 2007). Most of this literature focuses on family or friend relationships or describe the development of positive peer relationships within homeless populations and the subsequent impact these types of relationships have on housing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2002, McDonald et al. 2003, Davey 2004, Kirk & Griffith 2004, Lewandowski & Pierce 2004, Anderson et al. 2006, Weinreb et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000, Sanchirico & Jablonka 2000, McDonald et al. 2003, Davey 2004, Anderson et al. 2006, Ferguson 2007, Taylor et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%