2017
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1395856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A farewell to urban/rural bias: peripheral finance capitalism in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the liberalization/globalization of the Mexican economy that spurred the peasant crisis and increased rural migration flows to the United States has led to the gradual end of the rural–urban bias. The farewell to the urban/rural bias in Mexico has not only come, as Nadine Reis (2019) suggests, through the peripheral financialization of economic activities through cheap labour and debt, but importantly through the increased and now deeply entrenched interrelations of people, capital and peasant agricultural production between the rural/urban and the local/global spheres. These deep interrelations are, as this case study suggests, rooted in widespread cyclical international migration, remittances and the high levels of semi‐proletarianization of the Mexican peasantry.…”
Section: The End Of the Rural–urban Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the liberalization/globalization of the Mexican economy that spurred the peasant crisis and increased rural migration flows to the United States has led to the gradual end of the rural–urban bias. The farewell to the urban/rural bias in Mexico has not only come, as Nadine Reis (2019) suggests, through the peripheral financialization of economic activities through cheap labour and debt, but importantly through the increased and now deeply entrenched interrelations of people, capital and peasant agricultural production between the rural/urban and the local/global spheres. These deep interrelations are, as this case study suggests, rooted in widespread cyclical international migration, remittances and the high levels of semi‐proletarianization of the Mexican peasantry.…”
Section: The End Of the Rural–urban Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural land could be parceled and used individually but could not be sold or rented, whereas forests were to remain undivided (Klooster 2003). After a constitutional and agrarian reform in 1992, ejidos and agrarian communities could privatize and divide part or the totality of their collective land among assembly members, and sell or rent it to external agents (Randall 1996). The study area comprises 41 agrarian communities (161,231 ha), 51 ejidos (63,747 ha), 5 mixed communities, i.e., localities with both agrarian community and ejido (37,244 ha), and 131,567 ha of private property (Fig, 1).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sawmills in the north provide below-cost packing crates from illegal timber, and subsistence activities help supply cheap labor for the nearby orchards. Thus, benefits along the commercialization chain are being extracted at the expense of human resources and the forests in the north (Reis 2019).…”
Section: Processes Underlying Forest-cover Change and Conflicts And Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agriculture has substantial effects on the rest of the economy due to economic growth [3][4][5]. Agriculture directly affects macroeconomic policies, prices, and exchange rates [6,7]. Therefore, the role of agriculture and its relations with the rest of the economy must be understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%