2021
DOI: 10.1002/fes3.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A farming system typology for the adoption of new technology in Bangladesh

Abstract: Over the last three decades, few studies have been conducted to tackle the complexity and heterogeneity of Bangladesh farming systems. We address these research gaps with a new survey. Accordingly, a survey was conducted in North‐Western Bangladesh to understand how socio‐economic traits influence technology adoption and to identify and characterize key farm types. The survey was based on farm household characteristics, farm structure, farming practices and livestock as well as the economic performance of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the existing policy initiatives [e.g. National Agriculture Policy (NAP), National Fisheries Policy NFP)] are highly top‐down and overlook heterogeneity in the coastal farming system, which requires farm‐specific extension advice to improve livelihood as well as to address salinisation (Sarker et al, 2021). Thus, policy initiatives to address salinisation must consider the divergent impacts from multiple farming perspectives equally while considering the ramifications of one group over another with a place‐based approach that could resolve these differing situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing policy initiatives [e.g. National Agriculture Policy (NAP), National Fisheries Policy NFP)] are highly top‐down and overlook heterogeneity in the coastal farming system, which requires farm‐specific extension advice to improve livelihood as well as to address salinisation (Sarker et al, 2021). Thus, policy initiatives to address salinisation must consider the divergent impacts from multiple farming perspectives equally while considering the ramifications of one group over another with a place‐based approach that could resolve these differing situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dinajpur’s economy is primarily agricultural-based, with rice being its most well-known product [ 33 ]. The majority of land in this district is medium highlands (37 percent), followed by highland (5 percent), and medium lowlands (5 percent) [ 27 ]. Rice farmers prefer to grow paddy in either medium-high or medium lowlands due to several cost-effectiveness factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the rise of more valuable substitute crop products or maybe because some implements for production do not respond well to environmental mindedness, but it more likely seems due to long-term process inefficiencies within the sector. Most farmers’ lack of scientific farming knowledge and reliance on inorganic fertilizers, compounded with inconsequential micronutrient uses and meager adoption of soil testing-based fertilizer recommendations, have deteriorated the soil substances in the country [ 17 , 22 – 27 ]. This has driven the government to emphasize adopting sustainable intensification methods to increase yields by adjusting fertilizer use whilst decreasing disparagement to the environment [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explanatory variables for this particular study presented in Table 1 below are chosen from the existing literature on the adoption. The variables include farmers age (Tiwari et al, 2008;Ntshangase et al, 2018), education (Chuchird et al, 2017;Sunny et al, 2018), land typology (Endrias et al, 2013;Reza and Hossain, 2013), farming experience (Sunny et al, 2018;Sarker et al, 2021), household size (Challa and Tilahun, 2014;Araya and Holden, 2018), farm size (Deressa et al, 2011;Ntshangase et al, 2018), knowledge acquisition (Feder and Slade, 1984;Bairagi et al, 2018), off-farm or secondary income (Pandey and Mishra, 2004;Mottaleb et al, 2016), plot fertility (Kassie et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2018), credit availability (Simtowe and Zeller, 2006;Mottaleb et al, 2016), soil water retention (Albrecht and Ladewig, 1985;Genius et al, 2013), close acquaintances' adoption (Mendola, 2007;Jansson et al, 2017), and environmental awareness (Liu et al, 2013;Irfan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Measurement Of Key Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%