1992
DOI: 10.1109/78.157217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast 4*4 DCT algorithm for the recursive 2-D DCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar work has been done in this direction [9] which can actually be included as one specific example in the proposed approach. Hence, the algorithm presented generalizes all the possible schemes in designing a fast algorithm of 2D DCT via 1D conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar work has been done in this direction [9] which can actually be included as one specific example in the proposed approach. Hence, the algorithm presented generalizes all the possible schemes in designing a fast algorithm of 2D DCT via 1D conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[9]. The work described can actually be included as one specific example in the proposed algorithm, since all the various input grouping will end up with only four independent groups and the partition has the periodic feature as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Conclusion and Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, by using a polynomial transform (PT), Duhamel and Guillemot [24] [27][28][29][30][31], matrix factorization or recursive computation [32][33][34][35][36][37], constant geometry algorithm [38,39], and Chebyshev polynomial [40]. Among them, Britanak and Rao [36] developed an efficient recursive 2-D DCT algorithm for a rectangular 2 m ×2 n block sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct method works directly on lated from each one-dimensional DCT depends on the althe two-dimensional data sets and requires fewer lowed amount of pruning. The proposed algorithm does not multiplications and additions [2]. It was also shown require any bit reversal operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%