2009 16th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iwssip.2009.5367738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A FAST Algorithm for Adaptive Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Algorithm 2 is close to that proposed in [45][46][47], with the same differences as mentioned at the end of Algorithm 1 presentation. This Algorithm 2 is listed in Table V, and its computation complexity is given in Table VI.…”
Section: Lc1; T Lcnsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Algorithm 2 is close to that proposed in [45][46][47], with the same differences as mentioned at the end of Algorithm 1 presentation. This Algorithm 2 is listed in Table V, and its computation complexity is given in Table VI.…”
Section: Lc1; T Lcnsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We recall here that in [45][46][47], the authors proposed a comparable version to our Algorithm 1 with the same complexity (only in terms of multiplications). The differences between theses algorithms are as follows: (i) the proposed recursive relation of the likelihood variable .new/ L; t and (ii) the proposed periodic regularization of .new/ L; t that we propose in this paper.…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such algorithms can reduce computational complexity and on the other hand perform close to the full-update methods in term of convergence rate and Mean Error Square (MSE). There are several variants of the LMS algorithms with partial update methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In addition, partial-update adaptive filters may suffer from stability or convergence problems when the input signal is cyclostationary or periodic [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it is therefore valuable to reduce the computational cost for real-time implementation. In previous works [2,3], we have already reduced the complexity of the fast transversal filter algorithm (FTF) by using only a reduced-size forward predictor to compute the adaptation gain with 2N+5P multiplications. In this paper, in order to find additional computational reductions, we use the same FTF algorithm where the adaptation gain is obtained by discarding completely both forward and backward predictors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%