2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2211106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Analysis Technique for Electromagnetic Interaction of High-Frequency AC Current-Carrying Wires With Arbitrary-Shape Cracks in Ferrous Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the objective function, representing the error between the predicted and actual probe output signals, includes multiple unknown electric and magnetic field variables, thus increasing the likelihood of trapping in local minimum points for noisy signals. In fact, one cannot obtain an explicit relation for the objective function in terms of the unknown parameters of the crack depth profile, although several pseudo-analytical forward problem solvers methods have been developed for various ACFM testing modalities [26][27][28][29]. Besides, the computation of the error gradient in each iteration requires the solution of the forward problem which imposes additional computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the objective function, representing the error between the predicted and actual probe output signals, includes multiple unknown electric and magnetic field variables, thus increasing the likelihood of trapping in local minimum points for noisy signals. In fact, one cannot obtain an explicit relation for the objective function in terms of the unknown parameters of the crack depth profile, although several pseudo-analytical forward problem solvers methods have been developed for various ACFM testing modalities [26][27][28][29]. Besides, the computation of the error gradient in each iteration requires the solution of the forward problem which imposes additional computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the nonmagnetic material, both the magnetic permeability as well as electric conductivity in ferromagnetic steel are important material properties parameters. Therefore, some electromagnetic nondestructive techniques such as magnetic flux leakage (MFL) [3], magnetizing-based traditional eddy current [4], alternating current field measurement (ACFM) [5], metal magnetic memory (MMM) [6] and remote field eddy current (RFEC) [7] applied for the evaluation the surface cracks in ferromagnetic metals. However, MFL is unsuitable for detecting very narrow cracks (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a variety of defects, bottom cracks caused by stress and fatigue are often hidden and dangerous. Present techniques for detecting bottom cracks, such as eddy current [1], [2], alternating current field measurement (ACFM) [3], and ultrasonic techniques [4] are used. As one of the nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques, potential drop technique has been used widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%