2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and effective deep learning approach for road extraction from historical maps by automatically generating training data with symbol reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the building footprint extraction with a contemporary map, the historical map was georeferenced by determining multiple control points visible in both maps. Automatic segmentation of historical maps is considered a difficult challenge due to vast changes in appearance between maps of different epochs [164,288]. While one approach may be successful for the 1936 map, it may easily fail for another map.…”
Section: Data Processing 421 Building Footprint Extraction From Histo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the building footprint extraction with a contemporary map, the historical map was georeferenced by determining multiple control points visible in both maps. Automatic segmentation of historical maps is considered a difficult challenge due to vast changes in appearance between maps of different epochs [164,288]. While one approach may be successful for the 1936 map, it may easily fail for another map.…”
Section: Data Processing 421 Building Footprint Extraction From Histo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are a few state-of-the-art studies using machine learning methods for map digitization. For example, text detection in historic maps 38 , segmentation and digitization of historic maps 39 , 40 , feature recognition 41 , 42 , road extraction 43 , detecting road types 44 , and cadastral boundary extraction 45 , 46 using neural network, deep neural network, and convolutional neural network models.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the logit models such as the MNL model, the nested logit model, and the mixed logit model, are probably one of the most commonly-used travel mode choice models (Zhao et al, 2020). In recent years, machine learning has been popularized and pervasive in many fields, including but not limited to transportation, such as transportation mode recognition (Jahangiri and Rakha, 2015), traffic flow prediction (Pun et al, 2019), road extraction (Jiao et al, 2022), etc. A series of recent studies have indicated that machine learning can outperform logit models in travel mode choice modeling.…”
Section: Travel Mode Choicementioning
confidence: 99%