2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt04695j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and simple B–C bond formation in metallacarboranes avoiding halometallacarboranes and transition metal catalysts

Abstract: An electrophilic substitution on metallacarboranes by using a stabilized carbocation that can be made in situ is reported for the first time. This new synthetic methodology provides a new perspective on easy metallacarborane derivatization with organic fragments, which enhances the properties of both fragments and widens their possible applications. † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second example was reported in 2011 [17] . In 2020, while searching for a synthetic pathway for a similar [ o ‐COSAN] − ‐naphthalene bridge (see Figure 2B), using the activation of the B−H group with the trityl cation on [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 )(8,8′‐C 10 H 7 ‐1′,2′‐C 2 B 9 H 10 )] − , [18] we observed the formation of a B−C(sp 2 ) bond, but it was not the one sought with the naphthyl, 8‐C 10 H 7 − in the anion, but with the aryl group of the trityl. This led us to modify the reaction strategy and AlCl 3 was used as a Lewis acid, mesitylene as a manageable high boiling solvent (165 °C) with sufficient symmetric steric hindrance to prevent electrophilic attack on its structure, and the benzenoid species and [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] − as reagents (see Supporting Information) [17, 18] .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A second example was reported in 2011 [17] . In 2020, while searching for a synthetic pathway for a similar [ o ‐COSAN] − ‐naphthalene bridge (see Figure 2B), using the activation of the B−H group with the trityl cation on [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 )(8,8′‐C 10 H 7 ‐1′,2′‐C 2 B 9 H 10 )] − , [18] we observed the formation of a B−C(sp 2 ) bond, but it was not the one sought with the naphthyl, 8‐C 10 H 7 − in the anion, but with the aryl group of the trityl. This led us to modify the reaction strategy and AlCl 3 was used as a Lewis acid, mesitylene as a manageable high boiling solvent (165 °C) with sufficient symmetric steric hindrance to prevent electrophilic attack on its structure, and the benzenoid species and [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] − as reagents (see Supporting Information) [17, 18] .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, while searching for a synthetic pathway for a similar [ o ‐COSAN] − ‐naphthalene bridge (see Figure 2B), using the activation of the B−H group with the trityl cation on [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 )(8,8′‐C 10 H 7 ‐1′,2′‐C 2 B 9 H 10 )] − , [18] we observed the formation of a B−C(sp 2 ) bond, but it was not the one sought with the naphthyl, 8‐C 10 H 7 − in the anion, but with the aryl group of the trityl. This led us to modify the reaction strategy and AlCl 3 was used as a Lewis acid, mesitylene as a manageable high boiling solvent (165 °C) with sufficient symmetric steric hindrance to prevent electrophilic attack on its structure, and the benzenoid species and [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] − as reagents (see Supporting Information) [17, 18] . First attempts were done with naphthalene, but did not lead to the naphthyl‐bridged [3,3′‐Co(1,2‐C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] − (Figure 2B), but to an unexpected 3‐methylindenyl bridge (Figure 2C), which had been earlier synthesized and structurally characterized [19–21] …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This led us to modify the reaction strategy and AlCl 3 was used as a Lewis acid, mesitylene as a manageable high boiling solvent (165 °C) with sufficient symmetric steric hindrance to prevent electrophilic attack on its structure, and the benzenoid species and [3,3'-Co(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] À as reagents (see Supporting Information). [17,18] First attempts were done with naphthalene, but did not lead to the naphthyl-bridged [3,3'-Co(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 ] À (Figure 2B), but to an unexpected 3-methylindenyl bridge (Figure 2C), which had been earlier synthesized and structurally characterized. [19][20][21] From these two reactions with arenes, the one leading to a benzene bridge and the one not leading to a naphthalene bridge but to an extrusion (Figure 2), we concluded the following: considering that the standing framework, the metallacarborane, and the dimensions of both connecting cycles are the same, the difference in behavior is not steric but electronic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%