2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06686-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Branching Algorithm for Cluster Vertex Deletion

Abstract: In the family of clustering problems, we are given a set of objects (vertices of the graph), together with some observed pairwise similarities (edges). The goal is to identify clusters of similar objects by slightly modifying the graph to obtain a cluster graph (disjoint union of cliques).Hüffner et al. [Theory Comput. Syst. 2010] initiated the parameterized study of Cluster Vertex Deletion, where the allowed modification is vertex deletion, and presented an elegant O(2 k k 9 + nm)-time fixed-parameter algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let (G, p, k, S) be an instance of MHV, and S is a given minimum modulator to cluster of G. We describe an algorithm that works in O * (d d ), where d = |S| is the distance to cluster parameter of G. Note that it is not necessary that S is given explicitly. To find S, one can simply consider G as an instance of Cluster Vertex Deletion parameterized by the solution size, and employ one of the algorithms working in time O * (c d ), let it be a simple O * (3 d ) running time algorithm [16], or more sophisticated ones, working in O * (2 d ) [15] or even in O * (1.9102 d ) [5] running time. Note that this would not change the overall…”
Section: Edges Of Type (Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let (G, p, k, S) be an instance of MHV, and S is a given minimum modulator to cluster of G. We describe an algorithm that works in O * (d d ), where d = |S| is the distance to cluster parameter of G. Note that it is not necessary that S is given explicitly. To find S, one can simply consider G as an instance of Cluster Vertex Deletion parameterized by the solution size, and employ one of the algorithms working in time O * (c d ), let it be a simple O * (3 d ) running time algorithm [16], or more sophisticated ones, working in O * (2 d ) [15] or even in O * (1.9102 d ) [5] running time. Note that this would not change the overall…”
Section: Edges Of Type (Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 1 (Boral et al [1]). Let F be a dominating family of v. There is a cluster deletion set S of G of minimum size such that either v ∈ S or there is X ∈ F such that X ⊆ S.…”
Section: The Graph H Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Hüffner et al [8] gave an O * (2 k )time algorithm for Cluster Vertex Deletion based on iterative compression. Finally, Boral et al [1] gave an O * (1.911 k )-time algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x · (n + m)) time [6]. Our algorithm is based on the observation that twins can be handled equally in a solution.…”
Section: See Proof 5 (Appendix)mentioning
confidence: 99%