2019
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1664743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast candidate viewpoints filtering algorithm for multiple viewshed site planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a relatively diverse landscape, this detail seems to be sufficient, although it is still difficult to find works with such accuracy, especially for Poland [52]. Moreover, since the computation (1996), much effort has been put in by later works to develop faster and more efficient GIS tools related to view line tracking and zooming, reference plane analysis, and view partitioning into blocks [53][54][55][56]. For example, Miller and Law [57] performed an interesting analysis of view structure by building a 3D terrain model and calculating visibility shares of specific land cover types according to Corine Land Cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a relatively diverse landscape, this detail seems to be sufficient, although it is still difficult to find works with such accuracy, especially for Poland [52]. Moreover, since the computation (1996), much effort has been put in by later works to develop faster and more efficient GIS tools related to view line tracking and zooming, reference plane analysis, and view partitioning into blocks [53][54][55][56]. For example, Miller and Law [57] performed an interesting analysis of view structure by building a 3D terrain model and calculating visibility shares of specific land cover types according to Corine Land Cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rocky locations or inside a water surface etc.). The proposal of new algorithms for the reduction of candidate points is still underway [80][81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this, 2D isovist could be replaced by 2D viewshed analysis, which takes the height of a surface model into account; however, as noted by Weitkamp [102], viewshed does not calculate visible space, but visible landscape elements. An algorithm for deriving a viewshed minimal viewpoint set (equivalent to MIS) was proposed by Wang and Dou [103], as well as Shi and Xue [104]. The viewshed approach uses a candidate viewpoint filtering strategy to avoid a rapid increase in the number of viewpoints as the digital surface model resolution increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%