2010 First International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/pdgc.2010.5679877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast genetic algorithm based static heuristic for scheduling independent tasks on heterogeneous systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is an NP-hard problem, there are many approximation algorithms for solving the problem of realtime task allocation in a heterogeneous processor environment, including traditional real-time task scheduling algorithms such as deadline-monotonic (DM) algorithm [4], rate-monotonic (RM) algorithm [5], least-laxity-first (LLF) algorithm [6], earliest-deadline-first (EDF) algorithm [5], and linear programming-based (LP) algorithm [7] and the swarm intelligence algorithms such as ant colony optimization (ACO) [8], genetic algorithm (GA) [9][10][11], and shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA) [12,13]. In these studies, most algorithms do not consider energy consumption factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is an NP-hard problem, there are many approximation algorithms for solving the problem of realtime task allocation in a heterogeneous processor environment, including traditional real-time task scheduling algorithms such as deadline-monotonic (DM) algorithm [4], rate-monotonic (RM) algorithm [5], least-laxity-first (LLF) algorithm [6], earliest-deadline-first (EDF) algorithm [5], and linear programming-based (LP) algorithm [7] and the swarm intelligence algorithms such as ant colony optimization (ACO) [8], genetic algorithm (GA) [9][10][11], and shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA) [12,13]. In these studies, most algorithms do not consider energy consumption factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%