1995
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Level Set Method for Propagating Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
805
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,132 publications
(813 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
805
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational issue was first addressed with the introduction of the narrow-band schemes [1], [29], [38], which restrict the computations to a small vicinity around the zero level set representing the deforming interface. However, narrowband methods still need to explicitly store a full grid and additional data structures.…”
Section: A Efficient Level Set Methods On the Cpumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational issue was first addressed with the introduction of the narrow-band schemes [1], [29], [38], which restrict the computations to a small vicinity around the zero level set representing the deforming interface. However, narrowband methods still need to explicitly store a full grid and additional data structures.…”
Section: A Efficient Level Set Methods On the Cpumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity can be used in the appropriate differential equation to track the interface according to time. Interface tracking algorithms are usually based on the phase-field method [20][21][22], cellular automata [23] or the Level Set Method [24][25][26][27][28]. The main idea of the phase-field method is to introduce a phase-field variable that varies smoothly from zero to unity between the solid and liquid phases over the region, which is narrow but it has numerically resolvable thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the well known Osher-Sethian [19] level-set method can be employed to implement the surface propagation toward its optimal location. Efficient solutions for the resulting evolution equations can use either AOS [16,22] or ADI methods, coupled with a narrow band approach [7,1], as first introduced in [11] for the geodesic active contour.…”
Section: Lemma 6 the Robust Minimal Total Deviation Criterion Is Givementioning
confidence: 99%