2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast method for Stokes profile synthesis

Abstract: Context. The major challenges for a fully polarized radiative transfer driven approach to Zeeman-Doppler imaging are still the enormous computational requirements. In every cycle of the iterative interplay between the forward process (spectral synthesis) and the inverse process (derivative based optimization) the Stokes profile synthesis requires several thousand evaluations of the polarized radiative transfer equation for a given stellar surface model. Aims. To cope with these computational demands and to all… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was interpreted as the star's activity declining toward its magnetic minimum, due to which the spot distribution on the stellar surface was postulated to be more stochastic than during the high-activity state, veiling the possible drift due to the mechanism producing it underneath. We note that the results of Carroll et al (2007Carroll et al ( , 2009, computed from the same data with a different ZDI inversion method (Carroll et al 2008), also indicate a reduction in the magnetic field strength between the observing seasons 2004 and 2007. The authors reported, however, that a dominant and largely unipolar field seen in 2004 changed into two distinct, large-scale bipolar structures in 2007, not completely consistent with the proposed picture of the star declining toward its magnetic minimum with less pronounced, stochastic spot activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This was interpreted as the star's activity declining toward its magnetic minimum, due to which the spot distribution on the stellar surface was postulated to be more stochastic than during the high-activity state, veiling the possible drift due to the mechanism producing it underneath. We note that the results of Carroll et al (2007Carroll et al ( , 2009, computed from the same data with a different ZDI inversion method (Carroll et al 2008), also indicate a reduction in the magnetic field strength between the observing seasons 2004 and 2007. The authors reported, however, that a dominant and largely unipolar field seen in 2004 changed into two distinct, large-scale bipolar structures in 2007, not completely consistent with the proposed picture of the star declining toward its magnetic minimum with less pronounced, stochastic spot activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…All maps were computed with our Doppler Imaging (DI) and (Zeeman Doppler Imaging) ZDI-code iMap (Carroll et al 2007(Carroll et al , 2008(Carroll et al , 2009(Carroll et al , 2012. Here we give just a brief description of the code, for further details see Carroll et al (2012).…”
Section: The Imap Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code performs a multiline inversion of a large number of photospheric line profiles simultaneously. For the local line profile calculation, the code utilizes a full (polarized) radiative transfer solver (Carroll et al 2008). The atomic line parameters are taken from the VALD database (Kupka et al 1999).…”
Section: The Imap Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PCA decomposes a set of observed Stokes profiles into an empirical set of orthogonal eigenprofiles (e.g., Carroll et al 2008). As has been shown by Asensio Ramos & Lopez Ariste (2010) and Asensio Ramos & Allende Prieto (2010), a PCA expansion can result in a compact and sparse representation of Stokes profiles.…”
Section: Sparsity Of Stokes Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%