2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2018.8422845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Multi-Radio Rendezvous Algorithm in Heterogeneous Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For enhanced MTTR, multi-radio-based rendezvous for the homogeneous condition was recommended in [ 30 ]. Multiple-radio-based rendezvous with upper bound was illustrated in [ 31 ]. The average time for rendezvous was reduced significantly with different combinations of radios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For enhanced MTTR, multi-radio-based rendezvous for the homogeneous condition was recommended in [ 30 ]. Multiple-radio-based rendezvous with upper bound was illustrated in [ 31 ]. The average time for rendezvous was reduced significantly with different combinations of radios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of works have been conducted on how to design channel hopping (CH) sequences for this fundamental problem in CRNs [2]. Existing works can be categorized from different perspectives as follows: (1) According to whether users can adopt the same CH strategy, they are divided into Asymmetric role [3][4][5] and Symmetric role [6]; (2) According to the status of available channels, they can be divided into Homogeneous channels [7], Heterogeneous channels [8], Channel invariant [9], and Channel variable [10]; (3) According to whether users start CH at the same time, they can be divided into Asynchronous clock [11,12] and Synchronous clock [13]; (4) According to one or more users receiving information, they can be divided into Pairwise destination (Unicast) [14] and Multiple destination (Multicast) [15]. The ideal CH algorithms are expected to give good performance in terms of the maximum time-to-rendezvous (MTTR) (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%