2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast nonlocally centralized sparse representation algorithm for image denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sparse representations have received an increasing attention in many signal and image processing applications. These applications include denoising [21][22][23] , classification [24][25][26] or pattern recognition [27][28][29] . The use of sparse representations for AD is more original and has been considered in less applications such as hyperspectral imaging [30] , detection of abnormal motions in videos [31] , irregular heartbeat detection in electrocardiograms (ECG) or specular reflectance and shadow removal in natural images [15] .…”
Section: Sparse Representations and Dictionary Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse representations have received an increasing attention in many signal and image processing applications. These applications include denoising [21][22][23] , classification [24][25][26] or pattern recognition [27][28][29] . The use of sparse representations for AD is more original and has been considered in less applications such as hyperspectral imaging [30] , detection of abnormal motions in videos [31] , irregular heartbeat detection in electrocardiograms (ECG) or specular reflectance and shadow removal in natural images [15] .…”
Section: Sparse Representations and Dictionary Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall outcomes of the Tables (3, 4 Table 9 illustrates the average PSNR performance using nine different state-of-the-art algorithms under different noise levels on the 150 test images. In addition, this part compares the execution time and the performance outcomes between the proposed FQPSO-MP algorithm with seven denoising algorithms such as SNLM [32], BM3D [12], BM3D-SAPCA [33], FastNLM [34], FNCSR [35], K-SVD [7], and WNNM [16] to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed FQPSO-MP algorithm in large-scale image verity. We had produced 150image from the BSD500 [25] to guarantee a suitable comparison.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Proposed Fqpso-mp And The State-of-thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of impulse noises from the data acquisition process is difficult, and there is also no perfect noise reduction method [1,43]. Solution: In this LR-SVM-HLOG method, the noisy image blocks are identified by computing the average intensity values of the neighborhood pixel for the respective pixel.…”
Section: Diflculty In the Prediction Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%