2014
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast, robust algorithm for power line interference cancellation in neural recording

Abstract: Abstract.Objective Power line interference may severely corrupt neural recordings at 50/60 Hz and harmonic frequencies. The interference is usually non-stationary and can vary in frequency, amplitude and phase. To retrieve the gamma-band oscillations at the contaminated frequencies, it is desired to remove the interference without compromising the actual neural signals at the interference frequency bands. In this paper, we present a robust and computationally efficient algorithm for removing power line interfe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of each is N , the number of samples. For each the preprocessing performs two actions: Filtering the EEG reduces the noise by using a bandpass filter between 1–70 Hz, and removes the power line using a notch filter, between 8 and 52 Hz [2830]. …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The length of each is N , the number of samples. For each the preprocessing performs two actions: Filtering the EEG reduces the noise by using a bandpass filter between 1–70 Hz, and removes the power line using a notch filter, between 8 and 52 Hz [2830]. …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering the EEG reduces the noise by using a bandpass filter between 1–70 Hz, and removes the power line using a notch filter, between 8 and 52 Hz [2830]. …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of approaches have been proposed to attenuate or remove line artifacts, including lowpass and notch filters (Luck, 2005), frequency domain filters (Mitra and Pesaran, 1999;Mullen, 2012;Keshtkaran and Yang, 2014;Leske and Dalal, 2019), regression based on a reference signal (Vrba and Robinson, 2001;de Cheveigné and Simon, 2007), independent component analysis (ICA) (Barbati et al, 2004;Escudero et al, 2007) or other spatial filtering techniques (de Cheveigné and Parra, 2014). These methods are well known and widely used, and there are ongoing efforts to develop new ones (Leske and Dalal, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Tomasini et al used an adaptive power line interference filter to estimate the fundamental frequency and harmonics of power line interference, and the estimated interference was subtracted from the noise-affected biosignal [22]. Keshtkaran et al presented a scalable very-large-scale integration architecture of a robust algorithm for power line interference cancelation in multichannel biopotential recordings [23], and they also proposed an adaptive notch filter to estimate the contents of power line interference with a modified recursive least squares algorithm [41]. Although these filtering technologies showed great performance and robustness, the real time computation load is still high for low-power embedded systems, especially when the sampling frequency is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%