A Fast Spreadsheet Model for the Yield Strength of Superalloys

Abstract

Simulation methods allow the possibility of overcoming some of the deficiencies of analytical models. In a recent work, we have developed a numerical model (the details of which are published elsewhere 7 ) that considers the actual microstructure of a superalloy and uses accurate descriptions of dislocation behavior to predict the critical resolved shear stress for a given microstructure. This numerical model captures the physics of the problem accurately (for cutting via single APB-coupled dislocation pairs and bowing-assisted cutting), but is computationally expensive. In this work, we present an approach that uses the numerical discrete dislocation (DD) model to build a fast spreadsheet model that may be of industrial use.A methodology to rapidly evaluate the yield strength of superalloys using a fast spreadsheet model was explored. The results from a physics-based discrete dislocation simulation model were fit to polynomials. These were used along with appropriate heuristic logic, to develop a spreadsheet that can predict the yield strength from the composition, and microstructural parameters of an alloy. The model was compared with data available for a series of superalloys and found to have good correspondence. IntroductionThe nickel-based superalloys are a metallurgical marvel and have benefited from several decades of evolutionary changes. It is generally agreed by metallurgists that even in this class of the most evolved and complex alloys, the mechanical behavior is dictated almost entirely by the microstructure and chemistry of the phases. However it is also generally agreed that the ability to predict mechanical behavior poses great difficulties even when the microstructure and chemistry are well characterized in a given alloy. Of the various mechanical properties of design interest, the yield strength is likely the easiest to predict. There have been published works in which semi-empirical models were built using data from well-designed experiments with reasonable success. (see for example, Schirra 1 ) However for alloy design, and for studying effects of a wider range of variables, physics-based models are desired. The present work is an attempt at such a model. We begin with a brief description of the status of physicsbased models, to bring out the novelty of the present work.The paper is organized as follows. We start with a description of the microstructure as represented in the model, and a brief overview of the approach used to derive the spreadsheet model. We then present elements of this derivation, which include the numerical DD model. Next the results of a parametric study conducted using the physics-based numerical model is presented. The predicted dependence of the yield strength of superalloys on various microstrucutral parameters is shown. Finally the derivation of the spreadsheet model from these parametric studies is presented; the predictions of the spreadsheet model are shown compared with experimental data. Superalloy Microstructure Considered by the ModelThe focus of this...

Strengthening Mechanisms in Polycrystalline Multimodal Nickel-Base Superalloys

“…With regard to the strengthening due to strong and weak pair coupling, the magnitude of strengthening predicted by the model is similar to that predicted by some recent two-dimensional dislocation glide models [63,64] but with somewhat different dependencies on APB energy and precipitate size.…”

On the Effect of Nb on the Microstructure and Properties of Next Generation Polycrystalline Powder Metallurgy Ni-Based Superalloys

“…The description of the solid solution strengthening contribution was based on the model proposed by Gypen and Deruyttere, [34] which assumes a superposition of strengthening of individual solutes based on their concentration in the matrix and precipitate phase, both of which were calculated using thermodynamic models in ThermoCalc. The empirical solid solution strengthening coefficients were derived from the work of Mishima et al [35] at 77 K and were further calibrated versus temperature using the trough model proposed by Roth et al [36] An average grain size of 15 lm was utilized in the calculations along with a grain size coefficient of 450 MPa lm À1/2 , as proposed by Parthasarathy et al [33] As the experimental yield strength data available was obtained on material aged using P-SHT1, the average secondary c¢ size obtained through image analysis for this condition (Figures 1(a) and (b)) was used as an input for the models, i.e., the secondary c¢ size was set to 152 nm for both alloys. However, as the elemental partitioning coefficients used in the calculations could not be experimentally obtained, ThermoCalc was used to estimate them and as a result, the volume fraction as predicted by ThermoCalc was also used in the calculations so as not change the underlying alloy composition.…”

“…[16] In order to further elucidate the mechanisms governing the tensile and creep behavior of the developmental alloys, and assess the applicability of current models to novel alloy compositions, modeling of the mechanical properties was performed, and the data were compared to the experimental results. The model described by Parthasarathy et al [33] was used in the predictions for the yield strength of the alloys. Several coefficients were required in the model, which were estimated using values available in the literature.…”

The Effects of Heat Treatment and Microstructure Variations on Disk Superalloy Properties at High Temperature

“…Processing-microstructure models are in active development [10,11] that could potentially model how processing paths can tailor such microstructural features. Microstructuremechanical property models are now being adapted to newer disk superalloys for high temperature applications [12]. Thus, a good understanding of the relationships between heat treatments, microstructures, and the relevant mechanical properties is necessary to allow design of processing paths that achieve microstructures with preferred combinations of properties at high rim temperatures.…”