2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2012.6382392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fault-tolerant temporal partitioning scheme for safety-critical mission computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a fault is detected inside a component, the new resource model guarantees to provide an extra resource to the faulty component only until the fault is handled and thereafter, switches back to a normal supply as the demand of the component has also decreased. Contrarily to the previous approaches [9,10,11], the new model provides a more flexible and efficient resource sharing in presence of faults. The schedulability of the framework has been analyzed considering the Rate Monotonic (RM) scheduling algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a fault is detected inside a component, the new resource model guarantees to provide an extra resource to the faulty component only until the fault is handled and thereafter, switches back to a normal supply as the demand of the component has also decreased. Contrarily to the previous approaches [9,10,11], the new model provides a more flexible and efficient resource sharing in presence of faults. The schedulability of the framework has been analyzed considering the Rate Monotonic (RM) scheduling algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considering the periodic resource model [17], Hyun and Kim [9] proposed a task level fault-tolerant framework and later extended it with a component level fault containment with backup partitions [10]. Although it offers task and component level fault isolation, the approach remains inefficient as the highest possible resource is always required to guarantee the feasibility of the system even in the absence of faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%