2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87700-4_91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feasibility-Preserving Crossover and Mutation Operator for Constrained Combinatorial Problems

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a feasibility-preserving crossover and mutation operator for evolutionary algorithms for constrained combinatorial problems. This novel operator is driven by an adapted Pseudo-Boolean solver that guarantees feasible offspring solutions. Hence, this allows the evolutionary algorithm to focus on the optimization of the objectives instead of searching for feasible solutions. Based on a proposed scalable testsuite, six specific testcases are introduced that allow a sound comparison of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author in (Reid, 2000) discusses the possibility of having feasible solutions generated in crossover and mutation operations. In order to handle feasibility in the genetic algorithm, the creation of infeasible solutions is usually allowed, but they are additionally penalized with a modification of the objective function or correction with an additional repair algorithm (Reid, 2000;Yeniay, 2005;Lukasiewycz et al, 2008aLukasiewycz et al, , 2008b.…”
Section: Constraint Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author in (Reid, 2000) discusses the possibility of having feasible solutions generated in crossover and mutation operations. In order to handle feasibility in the genetic algorithm, the creation of infeasible solutions is usually allowed, but they are additionally penalized with a modification of the objective function or correction with an additional repair algorithm (Reid, 2000;Yeniay, 2005;Lukasiewycz et al, 2008aLukasiewycz et al, , 2008b.…”
Section: Constraint Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%