2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feasibility study of LEU enrichment uranium fuels for MNSR conversion using MCNP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two methods indicate that there is a decrease in the prompt neutron lifetime as you move from HEU to LEU as expected due to hard spectrum in the LEU fuel. This trend was also observed by some authors (Verboomen 2006, Jonah and Ibikunle 2009, Odoi et al 2014. The measured value of prompt neutron lifetime mentioned in the SAR is 81 μs (SAR 2005) The value of the neutron lifetime obtained using the new capability in the MCNP5 version 1.60 agrees very well with the value of 5.79±0.19 and 4.70±0.7 earlier reported for HEU and LEU core respectively (Jonah et al 2007, Jonah andIbikunle 2009) This indicates the capability in the MCNP5-1.60 to calculate neutron lifetime for NIRR-1 reactor without diluting the reactor materials with 1/v absorber.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two methods indicate that there is a decrease in the prompt neutron lifetime as you move from HEU to LEU as expected due to hard spectrum in the LEU fuel. This trend was also observed by some authors (Verboomen 2006, Jonah and Ibikunle 2009, Odoi et al 2014. The measured value of prompt neutron lifetime mentioned in the SAR is 81 μs (SAR 2005) The value of the neutron lifetime obtained using the new capability in the MCNP5 version 1.60 agrees very well with the value of 5.79±0.19 and 4.70±0.7 earlier reported for HEU and LEU core respectively (Jonah et al 2007, Jonah andIbikunle 2009) This indicates the capability in the MCNP5-1.60 to calculate neutron lifetime for NIRR-1 reactor without diluting the reactor materials with 1/v absorber.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Achieving the conversion of the NIRR-1 reactor from the current use of HEU is a good step in reducing and eventual elimination of HEU fuel in civil use (Trivelli 1999). A study by Jonah and Ibikunle (2009) has shown that it is possible to convert the reactor to LEU with enrichment of about 12.5% UO 2 fuel clad in Zr-4. Moreover, the core of the reactor is designed to operate for 10 years; core replacement is under consideration having operated for over 10 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major outcome of the CRP is that UO 2 pellets enriched to 12.5% would be used for the conversion of commercial MNSR facilities and the prototype in China. Similar investigations with the UO 2 pellets with enrichment of 12% and 12.5% have been reported for NIRR-1 in particular and MNSR in general [6] [7]. A detailed description of NIRR-1 and measured core physics data can be found in the final SAR [1].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Two LEU cores with uranium oxide fuel pins of varying diameters were investigated. According to the study, the ndings obtained are equivalent to HEU core and indicate that it would be viable to employ any of the LEU choices for the conversion of NIRR-1 in particular from HEU to LEU (Jonah et al, 2009). Omar et al, (2010) recently conducted a study of 235U burn-up for the HEU-fueled Syrian MNSR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%