2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feasible timetable generator simulation modelling framework for train scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[57] In 2012 Bayhan with one other proposed simulation model approach for a feasible timetable generator framework for railway scheduling problem. [30] In 2013 Corman with other three proposed iterative optimization framework for railway schedule using alternative graph method. [29] In 2014 Ariano with three other proposed MILP based AGLIBRARY advanced technique for practical real time scheduling and evaluate applicability in railway.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57] In 2012 Bayhan with one other proposed simulation model approach for a feasible timetable generator framework for railway scheduling problem. [30] In 2013 Corman with other three proposed iterative optimization framework for railway schedule using alternative graph method. [29] In 2014 Ariano with three other proposed MILP based AGLIBRARY advanced technique for practical real time scheduling and evaluate applicability in railway.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (11) enforces that every event must use exactly one track per relevant segment. Constraints (12) and (13) ensure that the entering and departing trains at segment 1 must select track 1 and track 2, respectively. Constraint (14) ensures that if a train enters segment 3, it must select the same track ID of the foregoing event.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the train scheduling problem in a rail transit system is quite complex [6]. Numerous proposed scheduling models and algorithms have addressed different but related optimization objectives, including capacity, route service, minimal delay, passenger demand, operating cost, and transit unit (TU) circulation [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, although the parameters of minimum headway and layover time at terminals were considered in these studies, other important factors, such as the tail track allocation strategy and delay recovery time distribution, were not included in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [12] explored the fuzzy and stochastic programming for freight transportation and utilized genetic algorithm to solve the chance constraint programming model. Yalçinkaya and Bayhan [13] put up a random simulation approach to produce feasible timetables. Krasemann [14] proposed a greedy algorithm using depth-first searching and evaluation function ordering to find the satisfactory solution of a train scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%